First Nations education bill: Ottawa won't move forward - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 04:26 PM | Calgary | -10.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Indigenous

First Nations education bill: Ottawa won't move forward

The federal government will not move ahead with the First Nations education act without support from the Assembly of First Nations, a spokeswoman for Aboriginal Affairs Minister Bernard Valcourt tells CBC News.

Spokeswoman for federal minister says Assembly of First Nations support needed for Bill C-33 to proceed

Aboriginal Affairs Minister Bernard Valcourt says "too much work has taken place" to go back to Square 1 on the First Nations education bill. A spokeswoman for Valcourt said Friday that Bill C-33 won't proceed without the support of the Assembly of First Nations. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

The federal government will not move ahead with theFirst Nations education act, aspokeswomanfor Aboriginal Affairs Minister Bernard Valcourt told CBC News today.

"This legislation will not proceed without thesupport of the Assembly of First Nations," saidAndrea Richer, director of communications.

On Thursday, in his first public comments since a special assembly of chiefsvoted this week to reject Conservative education reforms, the aboriginal affairs ministerlamented the fact that the AFNhas walked awayfrom its agreement with the government.

"One thing is sure: We thought we had an agreement. Those chiefspresent there decided not to honour that agreement that we had reached with the AFN," Valcourt said.

"I look forward to finding a way to not let the children, thestudents on reserves throughout all of those First Nationscommunities, to have to pay the price for this."

The aboriginal community remains split over Bill C-33, dubbed theFirst Nations Control of First Nations Education Act. Some saw it as a step in the right direction, and welcomed the $1.9 billion tied tothe bill. To others, it was a government imposing too much controlover First Nations.

Shawn Atleo suddenly quit this month as AFN national chiefafter becoming a self-described lightningrod of controversy for backing the bill, leaving the organization ina state of flux.

The divisions within the First Nations community were on fulldisplay this week when chiefs gathered in a downtown Ottawa hotel todecide how they would respond to the legislation.

Bill remains on hold

After hours of sometimes heated debate, the chiefs voted infavour of a resolution that rejects the bill and calls on the
government to negotiate a new education agreement that providestransfer payments to aboriginal communities.

The resolution also asks Ottawa to provide $1.9 billion tied tothe original bill immediately, with a 4.5 per cent escalator until a new deal on education is reached.

But Valcourt says too much time and effort have gone into the bill to start all over again. It was already retooled once beforeto include five key conditions needed to get the AFN's support, henoted.

"Then, we tabled the bill that incorporated those conditions. And moreover, the prime minister personally committed the fundingnecessary to implement this so that it'd be successful. And now, you know, we are back to what? Square 1? I don't think so. Too muchwork has taken place."

"In good faith, we worked together. I incorporated weincorporated those five conditions in Bill C-33 and wejointlyannounced a way forward that we had agreed to in Alberta," Valcourt said.

The bill remains on hold while he considers his options, Valcourt added.He also sounded frustrated when he spoke about the AFN.

"It was represented to us that the AFN was representing thoseFirst Nations across Canada and they were our interlocutor,"Valcourt said.

"We have invested tens of millions of dollars in the last 10 years, eight years, into the AFN for that very purpose, to have thisrelationship rebuilt. And, you know, so I respect their charter, Irespect their way of doing business, but we have got to find a wayto move this file forward, because it is the kids, the students onreserve who are paying the price -- not the chiefs."

With files from CBC News