Oilpatch giant sours on Alberta crude cuts, warns changes put jobs at risk

Oilsands giant Canadian Natural Resources, once a high-profile supporter of Alberta's mandatoryproduction cuts, says it is "extremely concerned" by revisions to the strategyset for next month, warning the changes"will hurt jobs" if the government carries through.

In a letter to suppliers last week, Canadian Natural Resources said while it had supported the government's actions to cut back oiloutput in the province, it feels amendments to the formula will see the company burdened with a "unreasonable and discriminatory" share of the curtailment.

"The revised methodology is flawed and clearly discriminatory to Canadian Natural and as a result directly impacts the heavy oil regions of Alberta," reads the letter dated Jan. 22, a copy of which was obtained by CBC News.

The Calgary-based company would not comment Monday on the contents of the letter.

But in its missive, Canadian Naturalwarnsit willbe required to cut back a third more production in February than in January if the changes are enacted,"and the reduced production will unnecessarilyimpact jobs significantly in the heavy oil region," including in Bonnyville, Elk Point and Lloydminster area.

A government spokesman said Canadian Naturalis being treated fairly, adding that the company "fought hard" for the policy that the government agreed was in best interest of Albertans.

"CNRL has benefited substantially from this temporary policy,"spokesman MichaelMcKinnonsaid in a email.

"We disagree with their characterization and it's disappointing to see them threatening suppliers with job losses when they're being treated the same as other producers.

"CNRL is being treated fairly and equitably under this policy, which they support, and the company will need to be accountable for their own regional business decisions."

Last fall, Canadian Natural Resources was one of the most high-profile oil producers to call on the province to imposemandatory outputcuts as a temporary measure aimed at tackling a costly crude backlog.

Premier Rachel Notley responded in December by announcing the government would cut oil production 8.7 per cent, or roughly 325,000 barrels per day.The cuts affect about 25 larger bitumen and conventional producers.The curtailment will endat the end of 2019.

Notley saidthe effect of the cuts wouldbe measured each month to ensure production is not reduced any more than necessary.Government officials also said producers had beenprovided the latitude to manage the cuts by assigning them on a per-operator basis, rather thanon individual wells or projects.

Since the curtailment came into effect, the price gap between Canadian and U.S. benchmark oil has narrowed to under $10 US a barrel. Last fall, it was over $50 US.

But in itsletter, Canadian Natural said it backed the government's actions to curtail production based on using the average of the six highest months from November, 2017 to October, 2018 to calculate the allowable volume for the first month of the curtailment beginning Jan. 1.

The company says the amended methodology for calculating the baseline uses the single-highest month of production over that same period, "which has resulted in a number of serious concerns."

"Canadian Natural is being burdened with 35 [per cent]of the curtailment total target volume, whereas Canadian Natural's production accounts for 23.9 [per cent]of all production volumes subject to curtailment," the company wrote. "As a result, Canadian Natural is taking 46 [per cent]more curtailment than its share of production."

The company said such a significant curtailment is not sustainable operationally, adding that the ECHO pipeline would need to be shut in, along with the production associated with it. Although Canadian Natural said this would impact jobs, it did not estimate howmany.

In a statement, two MLAs for the region, both members of the United Conservative Party,said they wantan explanation for the changes to the curtailment policy. Dave Hanson and Scott Cyrquoted a news reportthat estimated500 to 1,000 jobs were at risk.

While the UCP urged the government to impose mandatory cuts last fall, the MLAssaid it wasn'tmeant as a "blank cheque."

"The NDP Energy Minister needs to come to our community and explain their change," they said in a release.

McKinnon said the province isreviewing how much has been drawn down from all storage levels across Alberta. More details, including the next steps, will be available soon, he said.

"We've listened carefully to industry in applying this decision fairly, and ultimately this is a temporary measure as we fight for short, medium and long-term solutions to get top dollar for Alberta's oil," he said.

• MORE ALBERTA NEWS|UCP candidate clarifies $50K carbon tax claim
• MORE ALBERTA NEWS|Notleyencouraged by industry interest in building new Alberta refinery
• Read more articles byCBC Calgary, like us onFacebookfor updates and subscribe to ourCBC Calgary newsletterfor the day's news at a glance