Bernie Madoff investors seek $100M from Ernst & Young

Nearly seven years after Bernie Madoff's investment empire was revealed to be a $17.5 billion USfraud, the battle by investors to recover their losses ramps up in a case that goes to trial this week in Seattle.

A Washington state investment company is seeking to pin about $100 million of its losses from Madoff's crimes on auditor Ernst & Young.

FutureSelect Portfolio Management of Redmond and some related firms, headed by hedge fund manager Ronald Ward, lost a total of about $129 million in the pyramid scheme. In court papers, the company alleges that Ernst & Young would have uncovered the scheme if it had taken even the most basic steps to verify Madoff's assets something the auditing firm denies it had any obligation to do.

"This case is about the Madoff fraud and how it got to Washington state and how it's impacting real people in Washington state," said FutureSelect lawyer Steven Thomas. "Because Ernst & Young said the numbers were good, FutureSelect invested. Ernst & Young said over $4.2 billion in assets were real; they were fake."

Madoff revealed his fraud in December 2008 amid a collapsing economy, admitting that account statements showing clients held nearly $68 billion were a sham. The roughly $17.5 billion in principal invested by retirees, charities and other clients over decades was mostly gone paid out as fake profits or raided by Madoff's family and cronies.

Madoff, now 77, pleaded guilty to fraud charges a few months later and was sentenced to 150 years in prison. A federal trustee based in New York has recovered or made agreements to recover about $11 billion of the lost principal.

FutureSelect invested on behalf of other funds, retirees, a New York church and others, Thomas said. The investments were made in a collection of funds managed by Tremont Partners, which were invested with Madoff. Ernst & Young was the certified public accounting firm that audited Tremont's funds from 2000 to 2003.

FutureSelect sued Tremont, its parent companies, Ernst & Young and Tremont's other auditors in King County Superior Court in Seattle in 2010. The case was initially dismissed, then revived by an appeals court. Washington's Supreme Court denied a bid by the defendants to have the case transferred to New York or to apply New York law, which would not have allowed the lawsuit. Ernst & Young is the only defendant so far heading to trial; most of the others have reached confidential settlement agreements, Thomas said.

Ernst & Young says its role was limited

In a trial brief filed this month, Ernst & Young argued that it had a very limited role: to audit the financial statements for four of the 10 years FutureSelect invested in Madoff's funds. Its audits, for which it was paid $40,000 apiece, were simply to provide "reasonable assurance" that Tremont's financial statements were free of misstatements. Tremont's financial statements said its funds owned securities in Madoff's custody, which Ernst & Young said it confirmed by checking with Madoff.

Ernst & Young said its approach was consistent with that taken by every other auditor of every Madoff-advised fund.

And in contrast with the modest fees it received, the auditing firm said, Ward and Future Select received tens of millions of dollars in management fees.

"Any critical analysis of Madoff's purported strategy would have shown his astonishingly consistent returns were simply too good to be true," Ernst & Young's lawyers wrote. "Whether through wilful blindness or negligence, Mr. Ward's decision to continue investing with Madoff-advised funds (and continue reaping the resulting fees) caused FutureSelect to suffer losses when Madoff revealed his fraud."

Thomas disputed that Ward received tens of millions in fees, but said he did lose more than $10 million of his own money in the fraud.

Jury selection in the case was to start Monday. The trial is scheduled to last about one month.