Workplace gender equality could add $2.1 trillion to U.S. economy by 2025, says report - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 09:19 AM | Calgary | -12.0°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Business

Workplace gender equality could add $2.1 trillion to U.S. economy by 2025, says report

Efforts to bridge workplace gender parity over the next few years could add $2.1 trillion US annually in GDP to the U.S. economy by 2025, a report by the McKinsey Global Institute suggests.

Enhancing womens economic potential has 'huge ramifications' for growth. But don't hold your breath

Women in the U.S. currently hold 42 per cent of full-time jobs and 64 per cent of part-time jobs, while forming 46 per cent of the entire workforce. (Florian Choblet/AFP/Getty Images)

Efforts to bridge workplace gender parity over the next few yearscould add $2.1 trillion US annually in GDP to the U.S. economy by 2025, a report by the McKinsey Global Institute suggests.

About 38 per cent of the $2.1 trillion would need to come from higher female participation in the workforce;32 per cent from narrowing the gap between men and women who work part-time and full-time;and 30 per cent from boosting the presence of women in higher-paying work sectors.

The$2.1 trillion figure is 10 per cent more than the "business as usual" GDP projected for the same period if none of the proposed changes are implemented, the report says.

"Gender inequality is a pressing human issue but also has huge ramifications for jobs, productivity, GDP growthand inequality," the report reads."Worldwide, enhancing women's economic potential has gone hand in hand with achieving greater social gender equality."

Labour force participation

In order for the U.S. to achieve what the report calls a "best-in-class scenario" in terms of female labour force participation,all U.S. states would need to match thestates with the fastest rate of improvement toward gender parity in the workforceover the past 10 years.

For example, Iowa and Wisconsin have the country's highest work participation rates for women age 25 to 54 at 89and 87 per centrespectively. Conversely, Arizona and Utah have comparatively low rates for the same age group at 69 and 64 per cent.

The U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics projects a decline from 74 per cent female labour-force participation nationally in 2014 to 72 per cent in 2025. (Oli Scarff/Getty Images)

Utah would need to increase participation rates for women at more than three per cent a year over the next decade in order to catch up, because the state's current rate is a negative growth rate of 0.6 per cent a year.In fact, the U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics projects a decline from 74 per cent female labour-forceparticipationnationally in 2014 to 72 per cent in 2025.

An additional 6.4 million jobs would need to be created on top of the 10 million projected by the BLS by 2025 to accommodate the number of female workers in a"best-in-class scenario."

The reports says, in line with historical trends, an increase in female workforce participation is not expected to drive down male participation significantly. CitingBLS data, the participation of prime-aged women in the U.S. rose from 36per cent in 1950 to 76per cent in 2000, while the participation of men stayed over 90per cent.

Part-time vs. full-time work

Although women make up 46 per cent of the entire U.S. workforce contributing to 40 per cent of the country's GDP women currently hold 42 per cent of full-time jobs and 64 per cent of part-time jobs.

On average, a woman in the U.S. works 89per cent of the paid work hours of a man, or a little over one hour less per day, based on a 10-hour working day.

Women hold a higher share approximately double of unpaid care work such as cooking, cleaning and taking care of children and older family members, compared with men. (Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)

The report also notes women hold ahigher share approximately twice as much of unpaid care work such as cooking, cleaningand taking care of children and older family members compared with their male counterparts.

Such work is not recognized as GDP, which the reportsays could be valued at an estimated $1.5 trillion annually based on available data on minimum wages.

Other factors such as teenage pregnancy, single motherhood and violence against women the report says violence against women costs the U.S. $4.9 billion a year, mostly from direct medical costs and some from lost productivity also contribute to women working less in the labour force. Thisin turn reduces gender parity in professional and technical jobs, as well as women rising to leadership positions.

High-productivity sectors

The report says women are highly represented in lower productivity sectors such as social work, education and health-care services.

A sector's productivity is measured by GDP per worker in the industry. Lower productivity means lower wages.

Roughly 60 per cent of the 6.4 million additional jobs need to be in three high-productivity sectors:

  • Professional and business services.
  • Information sector.
  • Manufacturing.
To achieve full participation in the workforce, women will need to find jobs in high-productivity sectors such as professional and business services, information and manufacturing. (Sean Gallup/Getty Images)

Creating 6.4 millionpotential new jobswould require about $475 billion more capital investment in 2025, mostly from the private sector with state and local governments also contributing.

Much of the cash would go towardthings likeinfrastructure, innovationand talent development.

In a "full-potential"scenario, where the gender gap in the labour force is completely bridged, the reports says the amount of additionalGDP that could be tacked on could beas high as $4.3 trillion annually.

However, the report says that is not likely to happen.

"It is unlikely that women in the United States will attain full gender equality at work within a decade, because the barriers hindering women from participating in the labour market on par with men are unlikely to be fully addressed within that time frame and because, ultimately, such participation is a matter of personal choice."