B.C. husband convicted in domestic assault case despite couple's denial

An Abbotsford man has been convicted of assaulting his wife in front of their infant sontothe point where she feared for her life,even though the womansaid during the trial that the attack didn't happen.

The man was charged after he hit and strangled his wife during an argument at their basement suite home on Oct. 20, 2017.

The woman, identified in court documents as A.S.G., messagedher landlord for help: "[He's] trying to kill me."

But at her husband'strial eight months later, the woman told a provincial judge she couldn't remember what happened thenight she called for help.

Still, thejudge convicted the man anyway, sayinghe suspected the woman was deliberately minimizing the attack in an effort to keep her family together.

In his judgment, provincialJudgeKenneth D.Skilnickwarned the woman that tacticcould have a harmful effect on her son down the road.

"If he is raised to believe that violence is normal between a husband and wife, there is a risk that he will think that such behaviour isacceptable and normal in his own relationships when he becomes an adult," Skilnick wrote in thejudgement.

'He pushed my neck to kill me'

On the night of the attack, the trial heard, thecouple's landlord found A.S.G.bruised withtears streaming from puffy eyes down her swollenface. The whites of her eyes were bleedingbecause blood vessels had ruptured when her husband tried to strangle her.

WhenA.S.G. phoned 911, she told the operator her husband hadtried to killher.

The following partial transcript of the call was submitted as part of the trial:

A.S.G. cooperated with the Abbotsford police investigation after her husband was arrested,but changed her storywhen the casewent to trial months later.

She didn't show up to testify on June 25, 2018,despite being under subpoena.

When she finally did testify at a later date, she told the court she didn't"remember anything."

She also said she'd been living apart from her husband for "a long time" and that their son missed him.

A partial transcript of her testimony under cross-examination was included in court documents:

A.S.G.'s husbanddenied everthreatening or assaulting his wife during the trial.

Skilnick, the provincial judge,convicted the husband of assault on Jan. 18 despite the couple's denial that an attack took place because there was enough evidence to rule out the couple's "alternative explanations."

The Ministry of Children and Family Development(MCFD) was involved in the case after the attack and both husband and wife told the court their involvement was causing "stress."

"[A.S.G.]is being untruthful because she is under the misguided belief that doing so will somehow take the Ministry of Children and Families out of her life and will get the accused back home," Skilnick wrote.

"The Complainant may believe that it would be better if this incident was overlooked or forgotten."

The judge went on to say A.S.G. was "mistaken" in that belief.

"Young children are like sponges," Skilnicksaid.

Recantation not uncommon

The Abbotsford Police Department's dedicated domestic violence unit has handledthe highest-risk domestic violence cases in the city since its inception in 2010. The unit is made up of two detectives, two MCFD workers and two specialized service workers.

Police Det. Roy McBethsaid victims sometimes recant because they want their lives to go back to the way they were, not recognizing potential danger.

"I think one of our best defences isintervening early ... trying to address some of the hardships that she might be dealing with as a result of being separated from her partner," McBeth said.

"The longer things go on, of course, the more difficult it becomes for the victim," he said. "But until the offender behavior is addressedthere's really no way to change things moving forward."

He said it's largely the Crown's job to prosecuteif there's evidence a crime has been committed "regardless of the cooperation of the victim," for their safety as well as their childrens'.