Judge questions the court's role in managing public health orders to ban church gatherings

The chief justice of the British Columbia SupremeCourt says the attorney general is putting the court in an "impossible position'' by asking for an injunction ordering threechurches to stop in-person religious services until their challenge of publichealth orders is heard.

Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson sayspublic health ordersalready prohibit such gatherings and it's within the power of Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry and the government toescalate enforcement without a court order.

"There are alternate remedies,'' Hinkson told Gareth Morley,legal counsel for the Ministry of theAttorney General, during the hearing on Friday.

"I shouldn't be doing Dr. Henry's job. If she wants police tohave the ability to arrest people, the order can be amended, can'tit?''

The injunction request by the provincial health officer andattorney general comes after the churches filed a petition that challenges COVID-19 restrictions on in-person religious services,arguing the ban violates people's rights and freedoms.

They allege several charter violations including freedom ofreligion, belief, expression, peaceful assembly and association.

Lawyer Paul Jaffe, who represents the churches, told the courthis clients have adopted safety protocols similar to those approvedby Henry in buildings that remain open, like schools.

He said it doesn't make sense that people are allowed togather to do yoga or to study history, but not talk about God.

According to the court documents, the province is seeking an order that would prevent elders and members from gathering to worship in their churches and from organizing celebrations, ceremonies, baptisms, funerals or any other "event" as defined by Henry's orders.

The order would also authorize police to detain anyone they have grounds to believe is planning to attend a religious service organized by any of the three churches.

Jaffe argued that if shoppers are allowed to come and go freely at a Langley strip mall, soshould those attending a religious service in the same complex.

"The idea they can be arrested for intending to pray is incredible," he said. "It is incredible that any court can think about imparting the police with that kind of power."

He described the injunction application as "punitive'' and "vindictive'' whenthe court hearing is lessthan three weeks away.

However, Morley argued existing restrictions on worshippers aren'tworking and a court order could add weight and protect the public.

There is "no question'' that gatherings in the coming weeks createan ongoing risk to publichealth, he said.

"They have every right to challenge the public health orders,but they do not have a right not to abide by them in the meantime.''

Hinkson asked Morley what the government planned to do if it weregranted a court injunction against the churches. He noted a recentcase where an injunction against protesters was given to theVancouver Port Authority, but the public prosecution servicedeclined to enforce the order, saying it wasn't in the publicinterest to do so.

"If we're being asked to do these things and then we're toldit's not in the public interest to enforce our orders, I won't grantorders,'' the judge said.

The judge is scheduled torender a decision on the injunction request Wednesday morning at 10 a.m.