Former West Vancouver mayor was wrong to take $75K gift from godmother, panel finds - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 08:02 AM | Calgary | -16.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
British Columbia

Former West Vancouver mayor was wrong to take $75K gift from godmother, panel finds

A lawyer and former mayor of West Vancouver committed misconduct when he accepted$75,000 as a gift from one of his clients, a disciplinary committee has found. Mark Sager was mayor in the '90s and unsuccessfully ran again in 2018.

Mark Sager was mayor in the '90s and unsuccessfully ran again in 2018

A man in a purple dress shirt sits in an office.
Former West Vancouver mayor Mark Sager started his own law firm after leaving public office in 1996. (CBC)

A lawyer and former mayor of West Vancouver committed misconduct when he accepted$75,000 as a gift from one of his clients, a disciplinary committee has found.

Mark Sager, who ran for a return as mayorin 2018, said in an interview last year the gift could be easily explained away: the client in question was his godmother, who wanted to thank him for some legal work he did for her.

But the Law Society of B.C. found Sager still broke the rules when he took the money because lawyers in the province cannot accept a gift that is "more than nominal" from a client, unless that client has had independent legal advice concerning the gift.

Reached by phone on Monday, Sager said he had no comment on the law society's findings. He served as mayor of West Vancouver from 1990 to 1996 and has spent the last two decades heading his own law firm. He lost his most recent bid for mayor in October.

'Auntie J'

The misconduct surrounds Sager's relationship with an aunt-like figure he'd known since he was a child.

The law society's decision,posted online Monday, said the woman, identified only as J.B., was a longtime, "very close friend" of Sager'smother. Sager and his sister grew up with her and called her "Auntie J."

In 2012, J.B. had a fall at her North Vancouver home. Then 83, she was hospitalized and later moved toacare centre in West Vancouver. The decision said she phoned Sager for help six months after her fall,unhappy with the care she was receiving and her overall "predicament."

Mark Sager served as mayor of West Vancouver from 1990 to 1996, when he was in his 30s. He ran for mayor again in 2018, but was unsuccessful. (Facebook)

The society said Sager helped rewrite J.B.'s will, represented her in her divorce, and helped her estranged husband buy her out of her home the house she'd lived in for decades in the months that followed.

Sager would ultimately be written into J.B.'s new will, while her biological niece was written out,and would receive a $75,000 gift from the money J.B. made onthe sale of her home.

Assistant, associate unaware

The society said Sager asked hisassociateto "step in" regarding J.B.'s will in January 2014 because Sager was "conflicted out" due to his relationship with her.

Both Sager's assistant and hisassociate said theydidn't realizeJ.B. wasn't Sager's biological aunt, as they only ever heard him refer to her as Auntie.

Sager and his sister were included in J.B.'snew willas her "nephew and niece."

J.B. gave Sager the $75,000 gift that June.

Mark Sager is a founding member and senior partner of Sager LLP, located in the Ambleside area of West Vancouver. A campaign sign for Sager's unsuccessful bid for mayor can be seen on the building in a Google Streetview photo taken in October 2018. (Google Streetview)

Nearly a quarter of her estate went to Sager when she died on Jan. 21, 2016 at the age of 86. Sager was executor of the will.

The law society launched an investigation after J.B.'s younger sister complained in 2017.

During hearings, Sager admitted to what had happened but said it wasn't professional misconduct. He said he didn't know he was breaking the rules because they'd only been added to the B.C. Code for lawyersin 2013.

The decision said he argued "lawyers should be entitled to a reasonable amount of time togain familiarity with the new Law Society requirements."

The panel disagreed, saying the case was"not a situation where a rule of very recent vintage caught a lawyer by surprise."

The decision said Sager's behaviour was a "marked" departure from the standard expected of lawyers in the province.

A penalty will be decided at a later date.