Officials turning their backs on Surrey peacock problem, residents say

Residents who are fed up with a large group of peacocks in Surrey's Sullivan Heights area say the city is passing the buckand needs to step in to get the growing peafowl population under control.

The birds which number anywhere from 40 to 150 are welcomed by some neighbours, but many of the residents most affected by the peacocks right around 150 Street and 62 Avenue say they've been complaining to officials for years, and the problem has only gotten worse.

The issue reached a boiling point this week when Parminder Brar had a large tree cut down in his yard. Brar said about 40 peafowl were using the tree to roost each night. He now faces a $1,000 fine from the City of Surrey for cutting the tree down without a permit.

Brarsaid he had meetings about the birds and the tree with Surrey's manager of bylaw enforcement, Jas Rehal, but a permit to fell the tree was turned down and nothing was done about the birds.

Brarsaid he was just pushed to the edge after getting the runaround from the city.

According to Rehal, responsibility over the feral peacocks falls into a grey area.

"We at the city and our animal control, this falls outside our scope of responsibility," he said.

The B.C. Conservation Officer Service declined to comment on the issue, saying peacocks aren't defined as wildlife.

Sara Dubois, the chief scientific officer with the B.C. SPCA, said the organization has been hearing about the Sullivan Heights peafowl muster for years.

She saidit started when a hobby farmer raised the peacocks in the neighbourhood, before suburban development changed the community.

There are conflicting stories about how the birds got loose.

"It is not a great situation, of course, for the homeowners, and ideally these peacocks would be in a safer environment, but they haven't taken any interest in going somewhere else," said Dubois. "As long as the community can coexist with them, I think it's safe for all."

Duboissaid there isn't much that can be done, unless a hobby farmer in the region was willing to take the birds.

"These are feral domestic animals, so they are not a wild animal of concern that we would move for habitat purposes," she said. "This would be an issue for the city and animal control to undertake."

Rehalsaid the city tried to address the issue a few years ago, hiring a contractor to round some of the peacocksup.

"It did not end up so well," said Rehal, adding that he ran into strong opposition from some of the peacock supporters in the neighbourhood.

"The contractor was chased out of the area, so that contractor it's still fresh in his mind. It's not something he's willing to do at this time."

Rehalsaid that, by and large, the city hears from more people in the area who support keeping the peacocks in the neighbourhood, but those closest to the roost tend to be very opposed to them.

"You know, I think the community is definitely split on the issue," he said.

Rehal said the only thing being planned to address the issue is a community meeting where experts can help educate neighbours about the peafowl.

Follow Rafferty Baker on Twitter: @raffertybaker