B.C. ordered to hand over documents around mink ban as court fight continues

The courts haveordered the provincial government to hand over documents related to its decision to phase outmink farming in B.C. last year, as breeders' associations continue to fight to have the ban thrown out.

In a ruling posted online Thursday, a B.C. Supreme Court justice said the government has 30 days to produce an affidavitor sworn written statement with the information that was "directly or indirectly" considered when cabinet made its decision last year to shut down farming.

"I have concluded that the respondents should be directed to produce, to the extent they have not already done so, the [aforementioned] documents in their possession or control," wroteB.C. Supreme Court Justice Warren Milman.

Private memos, briefing notes

The B.C. Ministry of Agricultureannounced last November live mink would not be allowed on farms in the province by April 2023 and the industry would be phased out in 2025.

Officialscitedconcerns farms would become a "reservoir'' for COVID-19 infections after a number of outbreaks during the height of the pandemic.

The Canada Mink Breeders Association filed a judicial review in response, arguing the province chose to permanently shut down the industry without clearly understanding the health risks posed by mink farming.

They argued the government's plan infringes on international and interprovincial trade, which are federal jurisdictions, and saidthe decision to phase out the industry was unreasonable.

Before the petition is heard in court, the associationasked the court to order the province to turn over"a number of documents" that informed cabinet discussionson Oct. 18 and Nov. 24, 2021, aboutthe ban.

Some documents have already been released, including a "confidential policy advice" memo outlining Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry'sreasons for believing mink farming posed a risk to public health.

But the association argued some information is still being held back, including background policies, briefing notes and ministry memos.

Cabinet privilege, province argues

In response, the province saidsome documents werewithheld because theywere considered to be "confidential policy advice or information subject to cabinet privilege."

It argued the associationneeded to prove they weren't"simply embarking on a fishing expedition" and that the information they were after would actually berelevant to their case.

Certain documents, itadded, were also subject to"public interest immunity" meaning their publication would be damaging to the public interest.

Justice Milmanrejectedthe province's arguments. He said he could not properly consider the immunity argument because the documents in question were not released even to him.

The province has until early November to file its affidavit.

"If the parties are still unable to agree on what must be produced and on what terms [after 30 days], they are to schedule anin camerahearing before me to address that issue," Milman wrote, referring to a closed-doors hearing.

In an emailed statement, the Ministry of Agriculture and Food said it is reviewing the decision, and will not be commenting further as the matter remains before the courts.