Massey Tunnel replacement plans: the election debate that keeps on giving

It's been a B.C.election issue before, and it's back in the spotlight again.

The George Massey Tunnel, that aging piece of infrastructure that allows cars to driveunder the Fraser River between Richmond and Delta, requires replacing and, for years, the B.C. Liberal Party and the B.C. NDP have disagreed on how best to do so.

When the Liberals led the province, they planned to build a 10-lane bridge, which was scrapped by the NDP party in 2017, who then ordered an independent review andaskedlocal mayors to come up with a new plan.

They came up with the plan for an eight-lane immersed-tube tunnel with two lanes dedicated to transit andthe government was expected to approve the business case later this fall.

As British Columbians prepare to go to the polls on Oct. 24, CBC's The Early Editionbrought the NDP, Liberal and B.C. Green Party candidate from the Richmond-Queensboroughriding together to debate their plans for the contentious crossing at the south edge of the riding.

"Every single thing on their platform is an old idea that they're trying to regurgitate," B.C. NDP candidateAmanSingh said about the B.C. Liberal campaign promise to bring back their10-lane bridge plan.

Singh said environmental and farming communities were never on board with the idea of a large bridge and reverting to the plan will result in further project delays which the local business community has already said could jeopardize jobs.

"Frankly, this project needed to be done yesterday,"ShaenaFurlong, co-chair of the Richmond Chamber of Commerce told CBC Thursday. "We are not bridge orbust ... I think the people and businesses in Richmond are just ready to see some solutions."

Furlong said a replacement is critical for the efficient movement of goods between seaports and the Vancouver International Airport. She also raised the concern that 800 jobs could leave Richmond after London Drugs said it was considering moving its headquarters because of project delays.

B.C. Liberal candidate, Jas Johal, said his party was acting on the advice of public servants who said a 10-lane bridge is needed for the future.

"This isn't just a Richmond bridge or Delta bridge, it's for the entire region," said Johal. "And when we move goods and services to Asia, it's a gateway to Asia."

He said a bridge is less expensive to build to seismic standards than an immersed tunnel and will also have less impact on salmon in the Fraser River.

The Tsawassen First Nation has voiced its opposition to the tunnel optionbecause of concerns aboutthe local salmon population.

Earl Einarson,amember of the KtunaxaNationis running for the B.C. Green Party in Richmond-Queensborough and shares Johal's concerns about the salmon.

But Einarson also took issue with the impact he says a bridge would have on theAgricultural LandReserve because of the amount of land needed oneither side.

This land is important to Richmond, it's vital to Richmond. And people don't talk about the huge cloverleafs, which are going to come out of this bridge on both sides," said Einarson.

While Einarsondid not say what his party would do instead of the B.C. Liberals or the B.C. NDP, he did say what the Green Party would not do.

"We are firmly set against this whole concept of using this as a political pawn," said Einarson.

Tap here to listen to the complete debate on CBC's The Early Edition.