Quebec's legal action on Energy East mischaracterized, Notley says

Premier Rachel Notley says she's holding her fire for now on Quebec's plan to request an injunctionrelated to TransCanada's proposed Energy East pipeline, telling reporters the legal move has been mischaracterized as something greater than it actually appears to be.

"It is not the politically divisive and problematic issue that people might have first thought it was," the premier said during a press conference Tuesday afternoon.

"This is really nothing different than we've already seen in Ontario and B.C."

• MORE ENERGY NEWS | Nexen cuts 120 jobsin light of 'current economic reality'
• MORE ENERGYNEWS |Canada's energy sectorbracing for a decarbonized world

Notleysaid her staff hadbeen in conversation with counterparts in Quebec for the previous 18 hours, after being advised Monday about the province's planned legal move, which was announced Tuesday in a lengthy press release.

After careful review, the premier said Quebec's move amounts to little more than asserting its right to have its own environmental laws respected, in a way similar to what other provinces have already done, but doesn't include a separate process that would runparallel to the ongoing National Energy Board (NEB) review.

"It's an opportunity for local people to engage with whatever environmental concerns they might have and it informs the provincial government's submissions to the NEB," Notley said of what Quebec wants to do.

"There's been conversations back and forth that they somehow wanted more ... but it appears now that's not what we're dealing with."

Notleyalsosaid she has spokenwithTransCanadaand the company is "quite happy to proceed" with Quebec's process, as it is currently understood.

The premier added that she's going to "leavethe gun in the holster until we're actually at the gunfight," but that's not where Alberta finds itself at the moment.

"Should our understanding of what's going on change, then you'll see a different reaction," Notley said.

Jean slams Quebec's 'short-sighted' move

Earlier in the day, WildroseleaderBrian Jean said Quebec's movewill further pit east versus west.

"AsAlbertansbecome increasingly worried about mounting job losses, these types of short-sighted political games will only increase regional tensions across Canada," hesaid in a statement.

Jean ripped Quebecfor what he described as its reluctance to accept Alberta bitumen while being all too willing to receive equalization payments from Canadian taxpayers and oil imports from other countries.

"If Quebec wants to block our pipelines, they should send back the over $10 billion in equalization payments they are receiving this year alone and explain why they prefer Saudi and Nigerian oil over Canadian oil," he said.

Jean also criticized Notleyfor failing to "clearly and passionately make the case for Alberta's energy sector and our pipelines" and said it's time that the federal government "stopped playing on the sidelines and finally showed support for Canada's energy sector."

Call for national action 'sooner, not later'

Notley said she would and will come out with "guns blazing"if Quebec were to throw upa more egregious barrier to Energy East,but that simply doesn't appear to be the case at the moment.

"I think it's also important to know yourfacts and know what you're talking about, and to make sure that you don't let miscommunication create unnecessary division," the premier said.

She did agree with Jean, to anextent, when it comes to leadership from Ottawa.

"We need the federal government sooner, not later, to play its role in building the national economy and to get our pipelines built," Notley said.

Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr has said the federal government will letthe NEB do its work and won't rush to take a position onEnergy East, but noted the final decision doesrestwith cabinet.

Prime Minister JustinTrudeausaid Tuesday all parties share the common goal of balancingeconomic growth with environmental concerns.

"Canadians are united right across the countryabout wanting the kind of future for their kids and their communities that we know we need to be building and, at the same time, make sure we're doing it in a responsible, sustainable, environmentally sound way," Trudeau told reporters.

"That's something that Albertans and Quebecers and everyone across the country is united in wanting."

Wall weighs in

Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall, speaking at the opening of Husky Energy's Edam East plant on Tuesday morning, said the company's oil extraction is good for the entire country.

"All of Canada benefits from the work you do in Saskatchewan," Wall said.

Speaking to reporters afterward, the Saskatchewan premier also criticized Quebec's move as one that exacerbates regional divisions.

"I'm very disappointed," Wall said."It seems of late that we seem to be forgetting what's best about Canada."

Wall added that while Quebec has the right to raise questions and concerns about Energy East,provinces should not have the authority to veto thepipeline.

'A matter of respect'

QuebecEnvironment Minister David Heurtel, however, described the legal move as one aimed at ensuring the company plays by Quebec'srules if it wants to expand an existing pipeline through the provinceto reachan export terminal in Saint John, N.B.

"Today's motion is very simple and very clear.It signifies that whoever seeks to build a project in Quebec must comply with all Quebec laws and regulations," Heurtelsaid.

"This is not only a matter of respect, but equally a question of fairness towards all companies that wish to do business in Quebec."

The movecomes asTransCanadaispreparingforhearings at Quebec's environmental review boardnext week.

On Tuesday, the company said it would willingly participate in thosehearings.

"We want to be as transparent as possible and this is what we are going to do next week," said Louis Bergeron, TransCanada's vice-president for New Brunswick and Quebec.

Bergeron insists TransCanada is respecting Quebec laws.

"That is exact," he said. "It's before the courts. There is interpretation. There are certain aspects I can't talk about but it is a matter that is of federal jurisdiction under the auspices of the National Energy Board.''