U of C prof says academic freedom has been undermined

As the University of Calgary deals with an investigation into corporate sponsorship at its business school,an engineering professor is suggesting there are deeper problems related to academic freedom at the university.

• How the University of Calgary's Enbridge relationship became controversial

• University of Calgary to review Enbridge relationship after CBC probe

Martin Mintchev, a professor at the University of Calgary's SchulichSchool of Engineering,saysthe U of C needs to examine its recent expansion into China.

The U of C's relationship with China has had its ups and downs inrecent years. In 2010, the university was removed from Chinese government's list of accredited institutions after granting an honourary degree to the Dalai Lama.The accreditation was restored the following year.

In 2013, the university createdtheChina Regional Advisory Council intended to strengthen ties with the country, a move that culminatedin the creation of a joint research centre in Beijing with the Kerui Group, aChineseindustrial company that specializes in oilfield services such as drilling.

U of C's president Elizabeth Cannon travelled to Beijing to open the centre that is to focus on opening up China's shale natural gas resources. The Kerui Group provided $11.25 million in funding for the Beijing campus.

Also part of the China push was a deal to bring visiting researchersto the University of Calgary for research experience, funded by theChinese Scholarship Council (CSC). The university aims to have 25 per cent of its graduate students come from outside of the country by 2016.

Chinese researcher in Calgary

Beginning in 2013, Mintchevemployed one of those researchers in his engineering research lab that is focused on down-hole drilling navigation. He says that his experience with that one student shows that the university has a bias toward external fundersand that his complaints about the student's research have led him to the possible dismissal from his position as a tenured full professor.

• University of Calgary needs to take hard look at corporate sponsorships, critics say

• Big Oil U: Beware companies bearing gifts

The studentcame to the University of Calgary in the fall of 2013, as a visiting researcher sponsored by the CSC, in the first year of its deal with the University of Calgary. Hewas a PhD student at his university in China and was funded in part by the CSC and partly by Mintchev'sresearch funds.

Broadly speaking, the working relationship was rocky, but veered intoissues of academic freedom when the student submitted a paper to a scientific journal.Mintchevallegedthe student used material for which Mintchev claimed copyright.The paper listedMintchevas a co-author, and he claims,contained errors that needed correction.

Mintchev raised his concerns with the journal and saysuniversity administration interferedin the publication of the paper to the point where itcontacted the journal directlyasking for copies of Mintchev'scorrespondence. Meanwhile Mintchev made revisions to the paper so the student could publish it.

"Iworked on editing these errors under the constant threat of the university administration that if I do not allow the usage of my copyrighted material, or do not facilitate the publication of this paper that I am facing suspension or dismissal," said Mintchev in an interview.

Mintchev did edit the paper butsays that he is still facing discipline.

U of C response

The University of Calgary said that Mintchev's characterization of events wasnot accurateand that administration did notinfringeon his academic freedom by requiringMintchevto fulfil his duties to the visiting researcher.

After a CBC News investigation, the University of Calgary beganinvestigating its relationship with pipeline companyEnbridge in connection with the company's sponsorship of the former Enbridge Centre for Corporate Sustainability.

In an interview with CBC NewsNov. 18, Mark Starratt, a member of the University of Calgary's board of governors, saidthe university was not dealing with any other issues of academic freedom, although Mintchev had contacted Starratt directly in early November.

In a statement, the universitysaid that Dr. Mintchev's complaint was outside the scope of the independent review of the Enbridge centre, and as such it was not underStarratt'spurview. It said Mintchev'scomplaint iscurrently being investigated.

Mintchevbelieves that the problems run deeper than just one relationship between a researcher and a professor.

"In the complex relationship between the universityand external sponsorship and the academic freedom of professors to exercise their supervisory duties properly, I think theuniversity administration has profound problems."