TransAlta to undergo review after power manipulation ruling - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 03:24 PM | Calgary | -11.6°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Calgary

TransAlta to undergo review after power manipulation ruling

TransAlta will undertake an independent review of its practices following a ruling that says the company timed power outages to drive up electricity prices.

President and CEO Dawn Farrell promises to make results public

TransAlta initially rejected the allegations, saying the outages were for repairs and upgrades. The company now says it will conduct a review. (Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press)

TransAlta will undertake an independent review of its practices following a ruling that says the company timed power outages to drive up electricity prices.

The Alberta Utilities Commission ruled the company took plants offline at peak times for maintenancein 2010 and 2011. The commission could fineTransAltaup to $1 million for each day it shut down a power plant, which will be determined at a future proceeding.

In itsquarterly earnings statement this morning, TransAlta's President and CEO says the company was surprised by that ruling. Dawn Farrell says the actions that led to this case were stopped almost five years ago.

"We recognize our responsibility to ensure confidence in Alberta's electricity system," she said in a release. "We stand by the need for full and fair competition and look forward to working with the province and the AUC to address these questions squarely and openly."

She says the company will undertake an independent review to ensure its practices comply with Alberta standards, which will be madepublic.

There is no mention this morning about whether the company will continue to look at taking the case to the Alberta court of appeal, as it had said in an earlier statement.

This is not the first time TransAlta, which is based in Calgary, has been in hot water over price fixing.

Last year, it paid a nearly $150-million settlementafter allegations were raised that it manipulated the electricity and natural gas markets during California's energy crisis 15 years ago.

In 2011, the company admittedit had manipulated electricity imports, driving upprices so thatconsumers had to pay an extra $5.5 million for power.