Home | WebMail |

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Calgary

Oilpatch stays home from B.C. conference after Whistler mayor calls for climate-change compensation

Cenovus is the latest energy company to opt out of a investment conference in Whistler, B.C., after the mayor of that community called on Canadian Natural Resources to help compensate them for the costs of climate change.

CIBC tells clients it is considering the location of its conference held annually in Whistler

CIBC is hosting its annual investor conference at the the Fairmont Chateau Whistler in January. Some energy companies are opting out of the event. (Whistler Fairmont Chateau )

Oilpatch pushback to a letter written by the mayor of Whistler, B.C., has led to the cancellation of the energy-related portion ofa high-profile investment conference held in the mountain community.

In a recent letter, Whistler Mayor Jack Cromptonasked the head of oilsandsgiantCanadian Natural Resources to commit to pay for its "fair share of the costs of climate change being experienced by Whistler."

After the missive became public this week, a number of companies decided they would not participate in the investment conference, hosted in Whistler by Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.

CIBC then told oilpatch clients Friday it wouldn't make them choose between the conference and "doing what is right."

"Over the past days, we have been in dialogue with many of you regarding the letter recently sent by the Mayor of Whistler to one of your industry peers," RomanDubczak, CIBC's managing director and head of global investment banking, wrote in an email obtained by CBC News.

"In recognition of your collective and justified frustration, we do not want to put you in a position of choosing between our conference and doing what is right. We are therefore removing the oil and gas presentation stream from our conference agenda."

Dubczakindicated thatCIBC isalso looking at "thelonger-term locationofourWestern Canadian-based institutional investor conference." (Normally called theWhistler Institutional Investor Conference, the gathering isin its22ndyear and attracts institutional investors andcompanies from across a variety of sectors, not just the energy industry.)

'Taxpayers are paying 100% of the costs'

The controversy emerged this week when Crompton'sletter went public.

"Currently taxpayers are paying 100% of the costs associated with your product,"Cromptonwrote Canadian Natural Resources president TimMcKayin a letter dated Nov. 15.

"Communities around the world are increasingly expecting you to take responsibility for your products."

In a Facebook video posted Thursday, Cromptonsaid heregrets if the letter made anyone feel unwelcome. He acknowledged the community depends on fossil fuels and has its ownresponsibility to respond to climate change.

Canadian Natural Resources confirmed Friday that ithadwithdrawn from theconference inthe mountain community, slated forJan.23-26.

McKay said he would welcome the opportunity to sit down with Crompton to discuss his letter.

"We take these concerns very seriously," McKaywrote Friday in a three-pageletter provided to CBC News.

"Canadian oil and natural gas is an important part of the solution to reducing global GHG emissions."

Earlier in the day, other companies confirmed they would not be travelling to Whistler for the conference.

  • CenovusEnergy said in a statement that it would not be attending because "we need to take a stand against these non-stop unfounded attacks on our industry that fail to acknowledge the huge focus the oil and gas industry places on reducing emissions."
  • A spokespersonfor Gibson Energy told CBC News the company "has elected to withdraw from the Whistler conference in 2019 in a show of solidarity with our industry and our customers."
  • Cam Proctor, chief operating officer ofPrairieSky Royalty, said Friday his firm would not take part as well.

"We think that there's a great deal of misinformation out there about the energy business in Canada," Proctor said.

"There's not a lot we can do just from our own company's perspective to try to educate Canadians, but one thing we can do is basically vote with our feet, so we've decided not to go to Whistler this year."

Rocky relations

Relations between B.C. politicians and Alberta's oil sector have been rocky recently, due largely to opposing views on the construction ofthe Trans Mountain pipeline expansion to the West Coast.

The oilpatchand Alberta's provincialgovernment believe the pipeline is needed to ease bottlenecks and provide more optionsand better pricesfor Canadian crude.

Opponents' concerns includethe risk of shipping more bitumen on tankers, and about the impact that growing oilsandsproduction wouldhave on climate change.

In his letter, Cromptonsaid climate change isa great concern to the community. He said climate modelling shows that temperatures are expected to increase in winter and result in more rain in the valley.

"And less snow on the lower half of the ski areas," he wrote. "Our modelling also shows that summer seasons are becoming longer, hotter and drier, resulting in increased risk of forest fires."
Thousands of people march together during a protest against the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion in Burnaby, B.C., last March. (Darryl Dyck/Canadian Press)

Because of the fire risk, the municipality budget includes a $1.4-million investment in community wildfire protection a commitment it expects to have to make for at least the next four decades.

'We depend on fossil fuels'

In thevideo statement Thursday, Crompton said Whistler was one of 15 other B.C. municipalities who participated in the public relations campaign led by an environmental group.

"Our intent was to join that call to action; our aim was never to make anyone feel unwelcome in Whistler," he said.

"We recognize that there are hundreds of thousands of Canadians who work directly and indirectly in the oil and gas sector and they are very proud of the work they do. We know that you are facing challenging times.

"As so many have said to me over the last couple of days, we are a user of Canada's energy. Whistler acknowledges as a community that we depend on fossil fuels.

"We have a responsibility to respond to the climate change challenge ourselves and do it locally."

The environmental group that began the campaign last January says the aim is not to collect money, but start a conversation.
Steel pipe to be used in the oil pipeline construction of the Trans Mountain Expansion Project sit on rail cars at a stockpile site in Kamloops, B.C., earlier this year. (Dennis Owen/Reuters)

"At the end of the day, I think it's fiscally irresponsible if a municipality is incurring huge costs due to climate change and they're not having this conversation, because otherwise they're just passing those costs entirely onto taxpayers," said Andrew Gage, lead lawyer withWest Coast Environmental Law.

Albertanswant to push back, Solberg says

Monte Solberg, a former Conservative cabinet minister from Alberta, said he was "a little surprised" to hearcompanies areopting out of the Whistler conference but was glad to see companies pushing back and defending their industry.

"I think a lot of people have wondered why some of these companies have gone along with this up until now," he said.

Solberg said Albertans are slow to anger, but are at the point where they want to push back.

"We certainly have been a big customer of British Columbia's," he said.

"So one of the few ways that we can really make the point, apparently, is to say you know we're not going to buy your things. We're not going to come to your resorts anymore and that's what some people are doing."

With files from Reid Southwick