Black Lives Matter calls for new police carding researchers

Two researchers examining Edmonton's controversial police carding practices won't be fair and objective, according to two advocacygroups watching the review.

The Edmonton Police Commission chose Curt Griffiths, a professor of criminology at Simon Fraser University, to lead a review after a CBCNews investigation revealed police were checking black and Indigenous people on the street more often than white people.

The commission announced in July it was appointing an independent third party to look into thepractice of street checks.

• Indigenous women nearly 10 times more likely to be street checked bypolice, new data shows
• Edmonton Police Association defends street checks

"It's something we truly believed in," said Bashir Mohamed withBlack Lives Matter.

Mohamedbelieves Griffiths is in a conflict of interest because of workhe did for the Canadian Police Association in the past.

The CPA, he pointed out, lobbies on behalf of police around the country, including in Edmonton.

"Based on the fact that this was supposed to be, as they say, an unbiased and impartial third-party review," Mohamed said Wednesday. "I'm concerned as to why this wasn't raised as a red flag and how exactly they were chosen."

The Edmonton Police Commission sent a statement Wednesday toCBCNews, saying Griffiths's experience with police-related research makes him well suited to review Edmonton police tactics.

"The Commission has full confidence in the integrity of Dr. Griffiths and his team and their ability to carry out an independent and unbiased review of street check practice," said Tim O'Brien, acting chair of the Edmonton Police Commission, in a statement.

O'Brien went on to say that the commission recognizes "independent consultants in general may have contracts"with a number of different groups.

Mohamed is also taking issue with a PhD student in criminologyat SFU, Josh Murphy, who's helping Griffiths with the review.

Mohamed foundtwo posts he said wereon Murphy's Twitter account in 2014, whichbring the researcher's impartiality into question.

One, he said,draws a comparison between being black and being a police officer in the U.S.

"They [police] have the power of the law behind them while a young black man in the States does not," he argued.

"It's just a ridiculous comparison and it shows an extreme lack of understanding as to why these issues exist."

Another tweet seems to impart a defensive tone about being white.

"For him to tweet that just showed a lack of understandingand frankly it seemed immature for somebody who considers himself to be an academic."

Murphy's Twitter account is locked so only confirmed followers have access to histweets.

Neither Griffiths nor Murphy have responded to requests for interviews.

• Carding critics welcome Alberta-wide consultations on street checks
• Racial profiling or bylaw infraction? Police carding case debated in Alberta court

Mohamed is still calling on the commission to reset the review.

"I think this is a really important moment where they could have had somebody who hasn't had these previous connections, somebody local to do this review," Mohamed said.

"We hope the police commission takes action and selects researchers who are truly impartial and independent, that's our main goal."

The Stolen Sisters and Brothers Awareness Movement supports Mohamed's views on the researchers' inability to be impartial.

"I'm sure there's plenty of qualified researchers across Alberta, across Canada, who don't have those connections who could do the review," Mohamed said.

The street check review is funded by the Edmonton Police Commission. The results are expected in March.