Hamilton police board passes new carding policy with little fanfare

Quickly and with little fanfare Thursday, Hamilton's police oversight board approved a new street check policy with only one person voting against it.

After months of discussion, the Hamilton Police Services board barely talked about the provincially-mandated policy before rubber-stamping it.

Only Terry Whitehead, Ward 8 councillor, voted against it.

"I just don't support carding, period," Whitehead said.

Police have done good work on the policy, he said. But "philosophically, I just have trouble with the concept."

• Anti-racism committee wants police board members to listen about carding
• Read the Hamilton Police Service policy

Street checks have been a hot topic in Hamilton, where critics say the practice unfairly targets racial minorities.

It was even in the headlines hours before the meeting, when Matthew Green, Hamilton's first black city councillor, attended a Police Services Act hearing for an officer who faces charges of discreditable conduct, accused ofunfairly questioning him. Green was waiting for the bus at the time. Green has called the all-white police board "culturally incompetent" when it comes to dealing with the street check issue.

The policy comes after the province passed new legislation about the practice earlier this year. It mandated police boardsdevelop their own policies. Lloyd Ferguson, board chair and Ancaster city councillor, says the Hamilton policy is largely influenced by the province.

• Police union says Matthew Green creating spectacle over carding complaint

The new policyincludes:

• Requiring police to offer a receipt to someone who is being stopped, including the officer's name.
• Requiring the chief to complete an annual report of how many such interactions took place, and include in itdemographics like race and age.
• Data collected in street checks or carding interactions before Jan. 1, 2017 may be kept only under certain conditions such asofficer discipline matters or for the purposes of an ongoing investigation.

Activists, however, said the policy needs more detail around stops for people under 18, and the language police use to notify people of their rights.

For two years, street check opponents have made their presence known in Hamilton. There have been public meetings and marches where they called for a ban on the practice. Last September, Green organized a town hall with Yasir Naqvi, Ontario's attorney general.

Some anti-racism activists still aren't happy with Hamilton's policy. That includes Marlene Dei-Amoah from the city's committee against racism (CAR), who was one of two people to appear last month to give feedback on the policy. She echoed a familiar refrain that minority groups hadn't been consulted enough.

While Ferguson said two people speaking indicated satisfaction with the policy, Dei-Amoah said last month that it's more likely people are just weary.

"How many times do you want us to talk about this?" she said. "You're not understanding it. What other measures can we do to help you understand?"

Dei-Amoah invited police board members to an upcoming CAR meeting to discuss the policy, but only one member Ferguson, who already sits on the committee attended.

The new policy isn't just about street checks. It also deals with warrants and other circumstances where police deal with the public.

Police will report back to the board in a year on the impact of the new policy.

In London, city council called for a ban on street checks last month. The city's police services board was due to discuss it on Thursday.