Dofasco air emission case put over to March 2014 - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 07:12 AM | Calgary | -17.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Hamilton

Dofasco air emission case put over to March 2014

ArcelorMittal Dofasco was slapped with 13 air emission violations from the Ministry of the Environment earlier this year. A pre-trial date was set for March of next year.

Living near Dofasco is like Dantes hell, Dantes inferno, neighbour says

Lynda Lukasik of Environment Hamilton took this photo around 8 a.m. Dec. 3, 2013 of ArcelorMittal Dofasco's blast furnace and Number 2 Coke plant. She believes the emission opacity here violates the MOE laws. (Lynda Lukasik/Environment Hamilton)

The waiting game continues for the air pollutant court case against ArcelorMittal Dofasco.

The local steel company was slapped with 13 charges from the Ministry of the Environment for breaking air emission laws 10 months ago. The violations occurred last year.

At a court hearing Tuesday morning, a pre-trial date of March27, 2014was set, leaving local environmental groups waiting another three months to see action.

These are violations from 2012, said Lynda Lukasik, executive director of Environment Hamilton. Were still seeing issues daily.

The 13 charges relate to visible thickness (opacity) of the emissions that emanated from the company's smokestacks between April and August 2012.

This case has beenplagued with delays. The MOE was scheduled to disclose all evidence in the Dofasco case at a June 4 court date, but it wasnt ready. On that date, the adjudicator gave the provincial agency until Aug. 9 to hand over the documents to the defence team, but CBC News learned the ministry didnt submit their documents until two weeks later, on Aug. 22.

Neighbours concerned

Lukasik said the delays speaks to the underlying need for a better and faster process to penalize air emission offenders. Environment Hamilton has been pushing the provincial government to make changes, she said.

Meanwhile, Lukasik visits the area regularly. Based on what she has seen coming form the smokestacks, she believes more violations have happened since the MOE charges were laid.

Residents who live close to the Dofasco plant say their east-end neighbourhood is like living in hell.

Dantes hell, Dantes inferno, said Ron Romhany. Black clouds, flames shooting out lighting up the skyits horrible.

Thats the picture he said he sees from his window every day. Romhany has lived in the neighborhood for 15 years and attended Tuesdays hearing.

Romhany is not the only one concerned.

I moved because I got [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)] living there, said Lorna Moreau, a former McAnulty Boulevard. Im a non-smoker. My house is smoke-free and I got COPD. Its either pollution or smoking.

'Things have changed since ArcelorMittal took over,' former neighbour says

Moreau said she has difficulty visiting the neighbourhood she moved from earlier this year because of her health condition.

To me, it's appalling, she said. In the last five or six years, things have changed since ArcelorMittal took over.

Moreau lists off over a dozen former neighbours who have recently passed away.

They need to listen because the health costs and the health impacts of people living in Hamilton are great, she said. It needs to be addressedIts too little too late.

The Ministry of the Environment told CBC Hamilton in an email that March 2014 is the first available date. ArcelorMittal Dofascospokesperson Marie Verdun wouldn't comment on the case, citing the court challenge.

The company is working on a long-term coke-making strategy for Hamilton, she said. That includes closing a coke oven here to coincide with "a new facility we will bring on stream in Monessen, Pennsylvania.

The company also hasseveral initiatives to reduce environmental impacts from its operations, she said.

"We also continue to develop long term plans to continually improve our performance, including a compliance plan with the Ministry of Environment with regards to our coke-making operations."