5th-generation farm owner in Ontario fights city plan to take her property for industrial park

Marsha Rempelwants to save her 150-year-old farm the only home she's ever known and is fighting the City of Welland's decision to expropriate the lands for industry.

Rempel, 57, is the fifth generation to live onher family's crop farm, which she says is endearingly known asthe place with "the big red barn" that prompts tourists to park and pull out a camera.

"It's been home my whole life," she said of the farm in Ontario's Niagara Region. "It's like it's part of your lineage. It's part of your heritage. It's roots. They don't understand the roots aspects of this."

The city wants to build an industrial park on the land, which sits between two railway lines and Ridge Road and Highway 140. The biggest parcel is a 24-hectare (60-acre) field, along with about 2.8hectares (seven acres) on the south side of the railway.

"With six industrial parks nearly sold out and little employment land available, the need to acquire more city land is evident," said a city media release explaining the expropriationon Friday.

Move will createjobs in industrial-zoned land, city says

City council approveda bylaw to expropriate the land in a close vote at aDec. 1 meeting. Six councillors and Mayor Frank Campion voted in favour, whilefive were opposed.

The city said it supports the manufacturing sector by strategically locating lands close to the Highway 406 and Highway 140 corridors.If a property ownerdoesn't want to sell, the city said, it moves forward with expropriation, allowingit to purchase the land.

Steve Zorbas, the city's interim chief administrative officer, said there's a great demand for land that is service ready. Rempel's property is zoned for industry as part of theNiagara Gateway Economic Zone and has been for years, he said.

"[Our] priorities are to create new jobs for the city of Welland, and it's the best fit for us right now."

Zorbas said the city has talked to the owner on three occasions.Rempel said she has refused to sell the land for three years and called the city's pursuit akin to acting like "schoolyard bullies."

Money won't replace what is lost, says owner

Coun. John Chiocchio, who opposed the decision to expropriate, said before the December vote that "integrity sometimes [is] worth more than money" and that he was "dead against taking someone's land."

City council took a first step toward voting on expropriationat a meeting in July 2020 by approving the sale, while the December meeting approved housekeeping measures.

Coun. David McLeod said no one wants to remove someone from theirland, but the owner would be financially compensated and the contribution to the city would be "far greater."

"[The city's] money is not going to replace what was lost," Rempelsaid, noting she hadn't had any discussions about dollar amounts. "You can buy another house. But you cannot buy another home, and there's a difference."

Rempel said she remembers her grandfather farming oats, red cloverand corn on the land, back when it was known as Watters Farm. The farm now rotates between soybeans and winter wheat.

"I'm just afraid that they're going to take this farm, they're going to ruin that fieldand it's going to become surplus land," she said, pointing to land in Pickering, Ont., east of Toronto, that was seized by the federal government in the 1970s for construction of an airportthat never happened.

Decision not a done deal, city official says

After a notice of application to expropriate the land has been served, an owner can request a hearing at whichthe citymust demonstrate that the action is"fair, sound and reasonably necessary," the city news release says. It notes that after the hearing, the inquiry officer prepares anon-binding report that is then voted on by council.

Zorbas saidit appears ahearing will take place because no agreement has been reached, and heexpects a report to be presented to council for consideration in the fall or in 2022, depending on how the COVID-19 pandemic affects proceedings.

The timeline for an approved expropriation process, the news release said, can range from several months to several years.

At the July meeting, Coun. Graham Speck, whosecondedthe initial motion, called it a tough decisionbut one that wasbeing made for the"greater benefit" of Welland residents seeking stable, local jobs. But in December, he opposed the motion to expropriate.

Rempelsaid industry issaturatedin Welland, and she is concerned about vanishing farmland, adding she thinksthe move reflects how food and farmers are taken for granted.

"Why isn't food considered more sacred than industry?" Rempelasked.

A local community development group has started an online petition in support of Rempel, and copies are available in the farm's mailbox. Shesaidhundreds of people have shown their support.

Rempel said while she can't eat or sleep overthe thought of losing her farm, she'll oppose expropriationuntil the end.

"In spite of all of it, I will not give up," she said. "I will not hand it to them."

The expropriationwill be discussed again at a council meeting on Tuesday.