Mtis federation to sue after judge rejects request to block province from scrapping $20M deal - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 09:39 PM | Calgary | -11.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Manitoba

Mtis federation to sue after judge rejects request to block province from scrapping $20M deal

Manitoba Metis Federation president David Chartrand shot out of his seat and was the first to exit court Wednesday after a judge dismissed the group's request to block the province's planned cancellation of a $20-million agreement between the two parties and Manitoba Hydro.

MMF sought injunction to preserve 2014 agreement as other scrapped deal awaits judicial review

Manitoba Metis Federation president David Chartrand says he plans to file a lawsuit against the Pallister government after a judge rejected the MMF's request for an injunction against the province. (Bryce Hoye/CBC)

A Manitoba judge has rejected the claim thatthe province's plannedcancellationof a $20-million agreement between the Manitoba MetisFederation, the provinceand Manitoba Hydro will cause "irreparableharm" to the MMF and its constitutionallyprotected rights.

David Chartrand, the Manitoba Metis Federation's president, shot out of his seat and was the first to exit court Wednesday after Court of Queen's Bench Justice GlennJoyaldismissed the group's request to block theplanned cancellationof the agreement.

"I was definitely conveying that there is irreparable harm," Chartrand said outside court after the decision, describing the impact losing the Turning the Page deal, signed four years ago, will have on the Metis.

"They look at it more as a business relationship; this is about Indigenous [rights.]"

TheMMFnow plans to sue the government an optionJoyalnoted was still available to the group.

Joyal denied the MMF request for a court-imposed injunction against the province, which would have stopped the government from terminating the deal before a judicial review could be completed of another deal between the groups the province axed in this past spring.

'We had the right to terminate'

The Turning the Page agreement(Kwaysh-kin-na-mihkIapaazhinMichif, theMtislanguage) was signed in 2014.

The agreement lays out terms for $20 million worth of payments to the federation over 20 years in exchange for support for Manitoba Hydro activities, including theBipoleIII transmission line and theKeeyaskgeneration project.

In October,the provinceterminated theagreement,which Premier BrianPallistercharacterized aspaying people not to participate in environmental consultation processes.

Colleen Mayer, minister of Crown services, said the Manitoba government stands by its decision to cancel the Turning the Page agreement. (Tyson Koschik/CBC)

"What happened today with the courts overturning that injunction was it solidified what we already knew,"Crown Services Minister Colleen Mayer said Wednesdayat the Legislature.

"We had the right to terminate, we chose to do that and we're sticking with our plan to go forward that way."

'Attack on theMtisnation'

Chartrand said the money expected through Turning the Page was a form of compensation for losing land in development deals with Hydro, such as Keeyask and BipoleIII.

The funds would have gone toward things like much-needed cultural programming for Mtis people, he said.

"People need to understand this. We're losing this land for 80 years, the land we're talking about," Chartrand said.

"We're not going to be able to access that land again. It's gone. We're talking tonnes and tonnes of hectares of land, so our people can never use that."

The federation says the province violated the honour of the Crown in cutting the deal and going againstagreed-upon reconciliation processes for Hydro development.

Chartrandcharacterized the province's plan to back out of the Turning the Page deal as "an attack on theMtisnation" that infringes on constitutionally protected rights and could cause irreparable harm.

No 'irreparable harm': judge

Justice Joyal found thatquashing theagreement, as the province did last month, "would notcause irreparable harm" to the MMF or its constitutionallyprotected rights, as MMF lawyers Jason Madden and Mark Gibson argued it would.

Lawyers Sean Sutherland, Sacha Paul and Bob Atkins represent the Manitoba government and argued the MMFreceived $2 million upfront when it signed on in 2014, so it's not as if they haven't received any form of compensation thus far.

Based on terms laid out in the agreement,Joyalfound termination of the four-year-old dealdoesn't violateconstitutionally protected rights of theMtis. He agreed with the government's lawyers thatthe Manitoba government's duty to consult with stakeholders outweighed other considerations.

"We took the judicial review process first on the premise that we want to show again an opportunity for us to find a balance of how we can work together, but the province is shutting the door completely," Chartrand said.

"They're arguing basically the Mtisdon't deserve any of these resources."

2nd deal scrapped this year

The Turning the Page agreement was the second deal between the province, Hydro and theManitoba MetisFederation that the province scrapped this year.

In March, nine of the 10 members of Hydro's board resigned en masse, which Pallister said at the time was in response to the province's decision not to move forward with a 50-year, $67-million deal between the three parties.

At the time, the premier called the deal "persuasion money" and likened the federation to a special interest group.

That move prompted the federation to file legal action against the province calling for a judicial review in June,asking Court of Queen's Bench to overturn Pallister's decision and reinstate the deal.

Ahead ofJustice Joyal's decisionWednesday, Madden said the federation is trying to maintain the status quo until a full hearing can be held on that issue, which he sees as related.

"The underlying issue in the injunction application, as well as the judicial review that was filed back in June, is can the Crown act in this capricious manner, where they are not following the processes set out in a carefully crafted agreement a reconciliation agreement between an Indigenous community and the Crown?"

Justice Joyalsaid "there is a serious issue to be tried" regarding the agreements, and that may take place at the judicial review.

With files from Aidan Geary, Jillian Taylor, Ian Froese, The Canadian Press