The budget, is it about people or pavement? - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 06:26 AM | Calgary | -12.2°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
ManitobaBlog

The budget, is it about people or pavement?

Marcy Markusa reflects on what the provincial budget will bring to Manitoba.

Tune into CBC's Information Radio 6 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. weekdays on 89.3FM/990AM

Marcy reflects on the value of programs such as the Hands of Mother Earth healing centre that she visited earlier this month. (Marcy Markusa/CBC)

This Thursday is budget day in Manitoba and to say that the NDP hasa lot to manage is an understatement.

It's been two years since the PST was hikedto eight percent, kicking off months of turmoil in the party which nearlysaw PremierGreg Selinger lose his job after five key cabinet ministers resigned.In part, they
cited the upped PST as an issue. In part, they cited Selinger's lack of consultation on somekey decisions saying that they didn't feel like their concerns were being heard.

Selinger, however, won a critical leadership vote last month.He survived to see another day...and another budget.

The question is, what will we see in that budget?

Will it be about people or will it be about pavement?

Let's start with the pavement

Thursday is the day when we should be seeing the payoff for what we paid in.That PST hike is supposed to improve our infrastructure so you get to work faster and our highways are less embarrassing.Those promises, however, cost a lot of dough.

With approximately 30,000 vehicles and between 35 and 40 train movements passing through the intersection daily, the Waverley rail crossing has become a major bottleneck. (Winnipeg Public Works)

For example, let's look at the Waverley underpass, it has beenidentifiedas a top priorityfor funding.The head ofPublic Works says it's estimated to cost $175 million to get it fixed up.That cost would be split among three levels of government so the province'spiece would be about $58 million.

It could be argued of course, that the NDP would get a lot of bang for those bucks30,000vehicles go through the area daily and they would no longer be delayedby 30to 40trains each day.

Improved infrastructure is a visible reminder that your money was spent to make things better.You can quantify it, take a photo of it, or tweet out how the new underpass cured your train headache.

It's popular, even trendy, to talk about improving the roads right now.Who will argue that we couldn't use a facelift?

You could, however, take that money and spend it on people.

How about those people?

Improving the lives of people, however, is much trickier than pavement.People are more complicated to fixand by government cost benefit analysisstandards... not as reliable.

If you put money into a drug rehabilitation program and the peopledon't kick their addictions, was it still money well spent?

If you fund a safe house for sexually-exploited teenage girls, is it worth it in the long run?

I have some experience with that last example.I recently went to rural Manitoba to a secretly located healing lodge called Hands of Mother Earthor HOME.

Six young girls between the ages of 13 and 16live there, all are in CFS care and have beensexually exploited.Some of these children had been forced to sleep with up to 10men perday sincethey were just 10yearsold.

HOME gave them a chance to break free of the predators in the city and givethem a chance to be kids, to go to school, to heal if they could find a way.

When I was there, the girls were looking forward to going to the playground and jumping on the trampoline. The place was full of little hand-drawn posters with roses and hearts containing self-affirming messages like, "forgiveness is one thing everyone deserves."

So people or pavement?

Let's get back to our premise.

Whatis thepossibility of saving one of those girls worth to us as a society?

Drums are decorated by the girls at HOME in an effort to connect them to their aboriginal culture (Marcy Markusa/CBC)

Diane Redsky, the Executive Director of the Ma Mawi Wi Chi Itata Centre says the provincial funding for HOME is $800,000peryear... or $133,000 pergirl.

If you used the Waverley underpass funding you could reach 436 girls instead of six.

That value can't be quantified on a spreadsheet.

We have to find the value inour money being spent to prevent those girls from having to crawlup a riverbank after a beating or having to bepulled out of the water lifeless.At least we hope that they will survive but people, as I said, are complicated.

I personally have always been a big supporter of pavement spending.I get it.I want it.I think we need it.

However, at this particular time in our community, it's becoming increasingly difficult to see how a pothole trumps aperson in Manitoba.

We'll see how it all adds up on Thursday.We can only hope that our government has seriously considered how to spend each and every one of our hard-earned dollars.


How do you hope the money flows? Let me know on Twitter@cbcmarcy @cbcinforador on Information Radio'sFacebook page.