Court challenge, protest greet day one of Quebec's anti-religious symbols law

Quebec's new law on religious symbols has been on the books for less than 24 hours, but already opposition is being mounted on several fronts, bothin the courts and on the streets.

The law was rammed through the legislature late Sunday night bythe Coalition Avenir Qubecgovernment.It will barpublic school teachers, police officers and government lawyers among other civil servants in positions of authority from wearing religious symbols while at work.

By Monday morning, the National Council of Canadian Muslims and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association had filed a motion in Quebec Superior Court seeking an injunction and asking thatthe law be declared invalid.

"Quite simply,last night the Quebec government legalized religious discrimination,"Mustafa Farooq, the head of the Muslim advocacy group, told reporters on the steps of the Montreal courthouse.

The court challenge is being filed on behalf of Ichrak Nourel Hak, an education student and a Muslimwho will be unable to work in Quebec's public school system unless she removes her hijab.

Hak was busy studying for an exam and did not attend Monday's hastily organized news conference. But another education studentwho will also be affected by the law,Amrit Kaur, said the law forcesher to chose betweenleavingthe province or givingup her childhooddream of becoming a teacher.

"The state is forcing people like myself to take off my turban," saidKaur, who is Sikh. "I can't do it. Asking me to do that would be asking me to go to work upset every single day. It isasking me to reject who I am, and I can't do that."

Legal hurdle

Mounting a successful case against the law faces at least one significant hurdle. The law invokes the notwithstanding clause, which protects it from being contested on the grounds that itviolates certain sections of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, such as the right to religious freedom.

The motion filed Monday avoids claiming the new rules contravene specific sections of the charter. Instead, it argues the law iscriminal legislation, which provinces do not have the authority to pass.

It also argues that by limiting access to certain public institutions, the law violates the equality "guaranteed by the very existence of a multicultural, democratic Canadian federation."

The motion also takes issue with the law'swording, calling it "impermissibly vague" about what constitutes a religious symbol. That will encourage the arbitrary application of its measures, itself a violation of unwrittenconstitutional principles,the motion states.

The advocacy groups behind the legal challenge are hoping their case is heard as early as this week.

Beyond the courts

The courts, though, are not the only front where the law is destined to meet resistance.

More than 300people gathered outsidePremier Franois Legault's office in Montreal on Monday to protest the restrictions, including severalwho said their intendedcareer paths have been disrupted by the legislation.

"I'm here to take back my rights," saidNisrineFadi, 20-year-old university student who wears a hijab,who had hoped to become a teacher.

Many protesters donning religious symbols were adamant thatthe fight against the religious symbols ban is not over.

Jasraj Kaur isa young Sikh woman who studies nursing at McGilland wears a turban.

She said it's discouraging that the government isn't providing support to people who wear religious symbols but that her community will continue fighting the law.

"Our community is really strong," Kaur said. "We keep coming through to protest. We keep showing up."

Rabbi Lisa Grushcow from Temple Emanu-El-Beth Sholom in Westmountechoed Kaur'smessage.

"I think the government is counting on us disappearing on this,"said Grushcow, who wears a kippa. "There have been real coalitions formed between people of different faith groups and people who are secular who are allies."

The mayor of Hampstead, a small municipality on the island of Montreal, reiterated his pledge Monday not to implement the law. The English Montreal School Boardmade a similar pledge before the bill was passed.

Elected officials in Montreal have also been steadfast in their opposition to the new measures, althoughthe city's mayor, Valrie Plante,acknowledged she willobey the law.

She expressed concern, however, about how the law will be applied, given its vague wording and fuzzy distinctions about which symbols count as religious.

"I am still worried about how this will be applicable in a day-to-day life because this is about human beings," Plante said at city hall.

"Ultimately, it's not about a law or a clauseor phrases:it's about people that are part of Montreal's vitality, and I want to make sure they feel respected ... [and]can fully participate in our society."

The leader of the opposition party at city hall, Lionel Perez, wears a kippa. He pushed the mayor to strike a harder line with the provincial government.

"She's ready to fight the government of Quebec when it comes to transit issues.... But on issues of social cohesion, on issues that will hurt, not only Montrealers, but employees of the City of Montreal, what is she ready to do?" Perez asked.