2 tobacco firms' payouts in $15B lawsuit on hold after court rulings

Two of the cigarette makers that lost an appeal of alandmark $15-billion class-action lawsuit have obtained a temporary reprieve from compensating 100,000 Quebec smokers after securing creditor protection in an Ontario court.

A judge granted JTI-Macdonald Corp. creditor protection last Friday afternoon, and Imperial Tobacco Canada was granted creditor protection Tuesday.

It's the latest development in a legal battle that has gone on for almost 20 years.

The Ontario Superior Court decision also suspendeduntil April 5 all legal proceedings against all three companies that lost in the Quebec Court of Appeal earlier this month. Those proceedings includehealth-care cost recovery lawsuits being pursued in each province.

The Quebec Council on Tobacco and Health, one of the groups representing Quebec smokers in the lawsuit,called the move a"denial of justice."

"We weren't surprised that they made a legal move," said MarioBujold,strategic adviser for the group. "What surprised us a lot was that they didn't inform us about it in advance.

"They made this request in Ontario, even though the main judgment against them was in Quebec. It was done late on a Friday afternoon, in private, without the other parties involved in these proceedings. That's what surprised us."

Bujoldsaid the council's lawyers will beinthe Ontario court on April 4 to contest the ruling.

He said the matter would also be raised at a March 25 session atthe Quebec Court of Appeal, which was scheduled before the Ontario decision.

Landmark judgment

On March 1, the Quebec Court of Appeal upheld a landmark judgment ordering the three firms to pay approximately $15 billionin damages to the tens of thousands of smokers.

Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. confirmed it will seek leave to appeal thatruling to the Supreme Court of Canada.

However, whilethe two companies are under creditor protection,they won't have to disperse any funds to tobacco victims.

In a statement, Imperial Tobacco Canada said it sought creditor protection in part so it would not alsohave to pay JTI-Macdonald'sshare of the damages.

In a statement released Friday, JTI-Macdonald said it needed to seek protection under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act in order to "protect 500 Canadian jobs and carry on its business operations with minimal disruption.

"We fundamentally disagree with the court decision and are taking all necessary and appropriate measures to defend our lawful business," it said.

Two Quebec lawsuits were first filed separately in 1998 and were heard togetherin 2012.

In 2015, aQuebec Superior Court justice ruled in favour of two groups representing the Quebec smokers, led by the Quebec Council on Tobacco and Health, which argued the companies didn't warn their customers about the dangers of smoking.

One group includesindividuals who became seriously ill from smoking. The othergroup is made up of people whosay they areunable to quit smoking.

Plaintiffs with cancerwho began smoking before January 1976 are to get $100,000 each. Thosewho first lit up after that date are entitledto $90,000.

Those with emphysema will receive $30,000 in moral damages if they began smoking before Jan. 1, 1976, and $24,000 if they started smoking after that date. For the almost one million Quebec smokers who were unable to quit, the breakdown comes out to about$130 per person.

Ontario decision 'unacceptable'

Philippe Trudel, one of the lawyers representing tobacco victims in the class action, saidthe Ontario court's decision to suspend proceedings against thethree companies is "unusual."

Bujold said Ontario court's ruling can be extended beyond April 5, and he worries people in the lawsuit will never see any money.

"Companies are very good at finding strategies to avoid paying damages they were ordered to pay."

"The Superior Court in Ontario is suspending the rights recognized by six judges in Quebec. It's unacceptable."

JTI-Macdonald and Imperial Tobacco are also considering seeking leave to appealthe $15-billion judgment against themto the Supreme Court of Canada.