Garrison District building that was set on fire may be headed for demolition

A Garrison District building in downtown Fredericton that was built nearly 200 years ago is in danger of being demolished after it was set on firein March.

The building has undergone afire-damage assessment to see if it could be salvaged, saida spokesperson for the Department of National Defence, which owns the building at 11 Carleton St.

But the damage"has resulted in a complete structural, architectural, electrical, and mechanical loss,"Kened Sadiku said.

Another spokesperson said"it is recommended that the building be demolished due to the extent of damage."

The department would not provide a copy of the fire assessment report, sayingit could only be released via an access to information request.

The building, which wasset on fire in March, was known as the militia arms store and dates back to1832. It was used as a hospital starting in 1882, andit became the residence for the Carleton Street Armoury caretaker in 1918, the department says.

Sadiku said in a statement that while the Fredericton Military Compound is designated as a National Historic Site of Canada, the building itself is not, "as it does not possess significant heritage characteristics."

WATCH |'To tear it down would be a cultural disaster':

'It's simply wrong': Architectural historian says loss of armoury building would be a tragedy

3 months ago

Duration 1:00

Garrison District building known as the militia arms store was constructed in 1832, used as a hospital after 1882, and later as a residence for the Carleton Street Armoury caretaker.

But John Leroux, an architectural historian in Fredericton, said it isn't accurate to saythe militia arms store isn't a designated historic site or that it doesn't possess significant heritage characteristics.

"The military compound comprises four specific buildings, and it's even listed on the plaque that the militia arms store is one of those," he said.

"It lists that building in the exact same capacity as the other three buildings there. And [the designation] speaks specifically about the character-defining elements of the militia arms store."

The Parks Canada National Historic Site of Canada designation for the Fredericton Military Compound can be found online and says that only four buildings remain from the original British garrison, including the militia arms store. It says the buildings are representative of early 19th century British military architecture.

The designation lists key elements that contribute to the heritage and character of the militia arms store such as its rectangular wooden two-storey massing, its steep roof, balanced facade and inset chimneys.

"If it was torn down, the national historic site designation of the military compound would be radically transformed and cheapened," said Leroux.

The City of Fredericton is not involved in the ownership of the building but it was renting it at the time of the fire. The city did not provide an interview for this story.

Leroux said when looking at the outside of the building, much of the architectural value is still visible.

He said he wishes the Department of National Defence would speak to others who have a stake in historic downtown buildings and make sure that the right experts are consulted regardingthe importance of heritage buildings.

Tearing down the building would leave a hole in downtown Fredericton,Leroux said.

"We need to do better than this," he said. "There should be no reason not to try harder to salvage that building. It's easy to say 'tear it down,' but what then? Then, the city is that much poorer for it.

"It's one of the most important buildings in Fredericton."

On top of the architectural value of the old militia arms store, it also holds extensive military history, he said.

Another historian, Harold Skaarup, who sits on the board of directors of the York-SunburyHistorical Society, agreesthe building is part of the city's heritage and history.

But he does agree that the building should be kept as it currently stands.

"It's an eyesore," he said. "Yes, we want to save our history. No, we don't want the city looking like it's a bag of bones."

Skaarup said that as far as he can tell, the condition of the building is bad, and if those responsible for the fire report believe it needs to come down, then it should.

But he still wants the history preserved and thinks the best solution would be to tear down the burnedbuilding and rebuild it.

Skaarup said this could take a considerable amount oftimeand money. It would need to go on a list of Department of National Defence buildings needing repairs or replacements.

But he thinks the most practical solution would be to demolish the building and have concrete plans in place to one day rebuild.

"If it's restored in the shape that it's in now, to be historically significant and in conjunction with the original plans, then it's saving the history that makes it significant," said Skaarup.

"if it's sitting on the foundation of a historic building, then it itself will be a historic building. It's just the practicality of it."