Ex-husband of Dennis Oland's wife won't testify at murder retrial

The Crown has decided against calling the ex-husband of Dennis Oland's wife as a new witness at his murder retrial in the 2011 bludgeoning death of his father, based on some information provided by the defence team.

The nature of that information was not revealed in the Saint John courtroomon Wednesday.

It's also unclear what evidence the Crown had hopedRonald Ferguson,LisaAndrikOland'sex-husband, could provide.

Ferguson did not testify at Oland's first trial in 2015.

Crown prosecutors declined to comment on the matter after court.

The defence had objected to Ferguson being called as a witness. No reasons were given in court.

Ferguson could not immediately be reached for comment.

Legal battle over child support

He and Andrik-Olandmarried in 1989 and divorced in 2003, but arein the midst of a legal battle over their only child together, family court documents reveal.

Ferguson is seeking 16 months of retroactive child support from Andrik-Olandfor their 25-year-old son, Andru Ferguson, according to the documents. The amount is listed as "TBD."

He filed the motion on Nov. 19, 2018the day before Oland's retrial was originally scheduled to begin.

The motion is an attempt to bully meand I ask that it bedismissed.- Lisa Andrik-Oland

In a response filed on Jan. 22,Andrik-Oland alleges Ferguson has "timed his motion to coincide with court proceedings that I attend to support my husband."

"The motion is an attempt to bully meand I ask that it be dismissed with costs awarded to me," she wrote.

A case conference was held on Jan. 23, but a hearing will be heldbefore a judge of the Court of Queen's Bench, family division, to settle the dispute.A date has not yet been set.

Oland, 50, is being retried for second-degree murder in the death of his father, multimillionaire RichardOland.

He is the last person known to have seen his father alive when he visited him at his office on the evening of July 6, 2011. The body of the 69-year-old was found in the office the next morning with 45 sharp-and blunt-force injuries to his head, neck and hands.

A jury foundOlandguilty in 2015, but the New Brunswick Court of Appeal overturned his conviction and ordered a new trial, citing an error in the judge's instructions to the jury. He is being retried by judge alone.

The retrial is scheduled to resume on Thursday at 9:30 a.m. with the continued testimony ofPaymanHakimian,a computer forensics expert with theRCMP'stechnological crimes unit in Fredericton.

Crown prosecutor Derek Weaver had advised the court at the end of proceedingsTuesday of the Crown'sintentionto call Ronald Ferguson.

Weaverdid not initially identify Ferguson, sayingonly that the defence was objecting to a proposed Crown witness and that Justice Terrence Morrison would have to settle the matter.

It was only when the judge asked who the proposed witness was that Weaver revealed Ferguson's name and relationship to Andrik-Oland.

Morrison was scheduled to hear arguments from the Crown and defence Wednesday morningabout whether Ferguson should be allowed to testify.

But Weaver toldMorrisonthe Crownneeded more time to look into some information the defence had provided shortly before court started and "determine whether we stillwant to call this witness."

Weaver said the Crown had outlined its position regarding Ferguson in correspondence with the defence on Jan. 25 and followed up Tuesday night with a point-form summary of his anticipated evidence.

The defence sent a responseWednesday morning and "given the additional points that they have added, we feel we really have to check into this issue," Weaversaid.

The Crown's next witness wasn't available until the afternoon, soMorrison adjourned the trial until 1:30 p.m. When court resumed, Weaver advised the court the Crown had decided not to call Ferguson.

No computer activity after visit

Weaver then proceeded to questionHakimianabout his involvement in the investigation.

Hakimianattended the crime scene on July 7, 2011 and seized 12 items from the office, including computers, digital cameras, an external hard drive and aniPad.

His analysis found the last human interaction with the victim's main computer waswebsitebrowsing at 5:39 p.m. on July 6, 2011, around thesame time the accusedstopped by to visit.

Earlier in the afternoon there had been "continuous, continuous activity" on the computer,saidHakimian. "There's hardly any gaps," at most, "maybe a few minutes."

• On mobile? Get the latest details from our live blog

Two emails were subsequently received at 5:47 p.m. and 6:35 p.m., but they were not read, he said.

Hakimian also determined the victim's iPhone had been connected to the computer up until 4:44 p.m. and that a backup was completed. The iPhone has never been found.

It was the only item that went missing from the crime scene, other than possibly a note mentioned in a text message from the victim's mistress, Diana Sedlacek.

Other valuable items, such as the victim's Rolex watch, cash, electronics and the keys to his BMW, which was parked outside, were left untouched.