Plans for a proposed gravel quarry turn to rubble at Whitehorse council meeting - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 05:11 AM | Calgary | -11.9°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
North

Plans for a proposed gravel quarry turn to rubble at Whitehorse council meeting

Whitehorse rejected a proposal to develop a gravel quarry near the junction of the Alaska Highway and Robert Service Way. Local First Nations did not approve of the quarry being brought to that location.

Council rejected the proposal because it would make future use of the land unfeasible

Doug Gonder, with Norcope Construction, speaks to Whitehorse City Council in March about his proposed quarry development near Miles Canyon. City council rejected plans for the quarry at a council meeting this week. (Mike Rudyk/CBC)

Whitehorse city council rejected plans for a gravel quarry at a council meeting this week.

The proposal was first brought to council in March by Doug Gonder, the owner of NorcopeConstruction. He wanted to develop the quarry near the junction of the Alaska Highway and Robert Service Way.

Whitehorse rejected Gonder's proposal because future development of the site would have been unfeasible. (City of Whitehorse)

"We obviously need more gravel sites. I think the city themselves are running out,"Gondersaid onMonday night.

In March, city council said it was concerned about the quarry's proposed location.

City officials said it was too close to Ta'anKwch'n and Kwanlin Dn residential development lands, which interfered with the city's required 300-metre buffer between quarries and residential areas.

To develop at the proposed location, the city would have to amend the official community plan with a bylaw. And both First Nation governments wrote letters saying they didnot support the proposed amendment.

Frustrated with the process

When the amendment was first proposed, city administration recommended the application be defeated, but Gonder requested time to adjust his application and address the city's concerns.But the changes weren't enough.

At the council meeting, city staff said the development of a quarry at that location would have made future development of the site unfeasible.

After the meeting, Gonder said he is frustrated by the result and by the process. He said it was the city's planning department that directed him to this location initially.

"And what I find real puzzling is that you're working between administration that's working against you, while you paid your fee to go ahead and get your application started in the first place," said Gonder.

"So we've expended a gigantic amount of cost and time to this point."

With files from Max Leighton