Lawyer calls for dismissal as N.S. Supreme Court hears prisoner dry cell case

Lawyers from the Elizabeth FrySociety and the federal government presented arguments Monday in Truro, N.S., in the case of a woman challenging the use of a prison search practice called "dry celling."

At the centre of the case in Nova Scotia Supreme Courtis Lisa Adams, an inmate who was placed in a dry cell at the Nova Institution in Truro for 16 days this past May. Adams is serving a two-year sentence for drug trafficking.

The Saint John, N.B., womanwas watched in the cell with round-the-clock lighting andwithout a flushing toilet or running water after guards alleged she hid drugs in her vagina. Eventually, a doctor's examination revealed that Adams had no foreign objects in her body.

Adams and her lawyers have argued the practice is cruel, unconstitutional, and discriminatory to people with vaginas.

• Case challenges 'horrific' prison surveillance some consider harsher than solitary confinement

Ami Assignon, the federal lawyer representing the Correctional Service of Canada, said thepractice of dry celling can be carried out constitutionally, and argued the law that governs it should not be struck down as the court has beenaskedto do.

"An inmate should not be placed in the dry cell if the contraband is hidden in the vaginal cavity," said Assignon. "In this case, a mistake was made."

Call for dismissal

Assignonsaid Adams is using habeas corpus,an expedited type of legal hearing, to make constitutional arguments about the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The lawyer called on the court to dismiss the case, arguing a different type of legal hearing such as a constitutional challengewould be more appropriate in the matter.

Adams's lawyer, Jessica Rose, said habeas corpus is the correct format to use as it deals with wrongful detentions.Rose saidthe court should not restrict access to Charter arguments.

The Correctional Service of Canada lawyer's argument that what happenedto Adams was an administrative mistake that did not need to be addressed in this court casewas "totally insufficient," said Rose.

Adams was in court to listen to the arguments but did not testify.

'It's really hard to hear'

Her mother, Glenda Mason, said outside court it was "very upsetting" to hear the details of what happened to her 33-year-old daughter.

"As a mother, it's really hard to hear. Really hard to hear that your child went through something like that," said Mason, who travelled to the hearing from New Brunswick with Adams's brother.

Mason said she hopes to see change come out of thecourt challenge, so that no one will have to go through a similar experience in the future.

"For Lisa to be a part of that would make me very proud," she said.

Justice John Keith has reserved his decision.