Animal rights activists decry Ontario bill that would limit farm protests

Animal rights groups have begun protesting and petitioning against Ontario Bill 156 a law aimed at curbing activism against farms and farming practices.

TheSecurity From Trespass and Protecting Food Safety Act, 2019was introduced in the Ontario legislature late last year.

Agriculture MinisterErnie Hardemansaid the bill comes in response to complaints from farmers about animal rights groups trespassing ontheir privateproperty.

• 'The farm is also our home': Proposed bill suggests peace of mind for farmers

In debate, Hardeman calledthe bill a "bio-security" measure, to protect food safety. The bill is now in its second reading.

If passed, the bill would increase fines for anyone caughttrespassing on farmlandand food processing plants, and introduce new measures against interfering with animal transportation.

The law would also make it illegal to gain access to a farm under "false pretences" effectively making undercover filming an offence.

Ottawa protests

A group of about 20 animal rights activists showed up at Ottawa's Lansdowne Park Saturday with signs and leaflets, encouraging the public to sign a petition against the law.It was one of several protests planned over the next month,

"Itwill stop people from seeing animal suffering," said Lucie Tsi, who works with the Ottawa group Animal Rebellion.

She fears the proposed lawwill halt animal activism.

If caught trespassingon a farm, offenders could be fined as much as $25,000, a significant hike fromthe current$10,000 maximum under the Trespass to Property Act.

It would also introduce fines for interacting with farm animals which arebeing transported by a vehicle without permission.

Krajnc case would be illegal

Tsi points to the example of Ontario activist Anita Krajncwho made headlines in 2017 when she was arrested for giving water to pigs on the back of a transport truck on the way to a slaughterhouse.

• Pig Trial: Anita Krajnc found not guilty of mischief charge for giving water to pigs

Krajnc was acquitted on charges of mischief, but if the new law is passed, similar actions could be found in violation.

Farmers have been lobbying for legislation toprotect them from the threat of more "aggressive tactics" fromanimal rights activists.

"It poses stress on farmers, and anxiety that it might happen to them," said Mireille Leroux, first vice-president of the Union des Cultivateurs Franco-Ontariens.

"The more aggressive activism is what farmers fear the most," she said."So we want to keep our families safe, and our work environment safe."

Legislation 'unconstitutional'

Similar legislation was passed in Alberta earlier this year, and also exists in the United States.

But among the half-dozen states that now have what activists call "Ag-Gag" laws, courts have struck down legislation in Idaho, Iowa and Utah as being unconstitutional.

Last weeka U.S. federal judge ruled the law in Kansasbanning undercover filming at farms and slaughterhouse facilities "criminalizes" free speech.

"The prohibition on taking pictures at an animal facility regulates speech for First Amendment purposes," wrote U.S. District JudgeKathryn Vratil.

Camille Labchuk, a lawyer with the group Animal Justice, said Ontario's law could also be challenged in court.

"The legislation makes it illegal to essentially expose animal cruelty on farms," she said.

"It makes it very difficult for advocates to expose what happens behind closed doors, and that restricts people's freedom of expression."