Federal departments violated privacy directive, committee hears - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 03:19 AM | Calgary | -14.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Ottawa

Federal departments violated privacy directive, committee hears

Canada's privacy commissioner appeared Thursday before a parliamentary committee looking into the federal government's use of tools capable of extracting personal data from mobile phones, computers and tablets.

Privacy Commissioner Philippe Dufresne called to discuss data extraction tools

A man sits at a desk during a committee meeting.
Privacy Commissioner Philippe Dufresne is the first person to appear before a parliamentary standing committee examining federal use of personal data extraction tools. (CBC)

Canada's privacy commissioner told a parliamentary committee looking into the federal government'suse of tools capable of extracting personal data from mobile phones, computers and tabletsthat necessary steps had been skipped.

Philippe Dufresne said he first learned of these tools being used by at least13 federal departments and agencies through a Radio-Canada report published in November.

His office should not be learning about the use of such technology after the fact, he told thestanding committee on access to information, privacy and ethics on Thursday.

The tools being used by those federal departments can recover even encrypted and password-protected data found on mobile phones or computers.

Certain software can also be used to access a user's cloud-based data and reveal their internet search history, deleted content and social media activity.

Digital forensics tools "can be used in ways that do raise important privacyrisks," the privacy commissioner said.

A federal directive requiresall federal institutions carry out a privacy impact assessmentprior to any new activity that involves the collection or handling of personal information. The goal is identifying privacy risks and ways of mitigating or eliminating them.

None of the 13 agencies or departments carried out such an assessment.

Two black data collection devices.
These two devices that enable data collection are examples of those purchased by some federal departments and agencies. (Cellebrite/Magnet Forensics)

Privacy assessmentsneeded, commissioner says

Dufresne lamented the fact that this requirement is still not enshrined in the Privacy Actto make it a binding legal obligation.

"Often we'll see the situation where the tool is developed, it's used, and then we do a privacy and impact assessment," he said.

In a time where technology is becoming more and more powerful, Dufresne said privacy protection is even more necessary.

"It's going to be even more important to reassure Canadians," he said. "We need to have that reflex of privacy by design, privacy at the front end."

Dufresne said he's communicated with the 13 federal departments and agencies following Radio-Canada's reporting and is pushing them to carry out privacy impact assessments but he does not have the necessary powers to force them to.

Someone's hands typing on a keyboard, with black text over it about what government departments had to say about a privacy assessment

"Some of these tools can be used appropriately. There are good reasons for it, but we need that privacy check. We need that assessment," Dufresne said.

The 13 departments and agenciesin question will have the chance to explain their use of these data extraction tools in front of the committee in the coming weeks. Somesay they use this technology to conduct internal investigationsor to enforce laws.

Committee member and NDP MP Matthew Greensaid he's concerned there are potentially more departments also using these technologies.

The committee has agreed to communicate with each of the 137 federal institutions to hold them to account.

Clarifications

  • In a previous version of this story, it listed the RCMP as one of the agencies that said it did not believe a privacy impact assessment was necessary. After the story was published, the RCMP contacted the CBC and said the RCMP are conducting a privacy impact assessment.
    Feb 07, 2024 11:42 AM ET