City wants to stop tax rebates for owners of vacant buildings - Action News
Home WebMail Sunday, November 24, 2024, 12:31 AM | Calgary | -12.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Ottawa

City wants to stop tax rebates for owners of vacant buildings

The city is looking to phase out a provincial rebate scheme for owners of vacant buildings that is costing taxpayers $17 million a year.

Provincially run property tax rebate costs taxpayers $17M a year

City of Ottawa generic logo sign City Hall Summer 2016
City council's finance and economic development committee will consider eliminating the vacancy rebate program. (Kristy Nease/CBC)

The cityis looking to phase out a rebatescheme for owners of vacant buildings that is costing taxpayers $17 million a year.

The so-called Vacancy Rebate Program, mandated by the province, allows owners of commercial and industrial buildings to apply for hefty tax refunds90 days after their properties become vacant.

Commercial property owners are eligiblefor 30-per-cent rebates, while industrial property owners can receive a 35 per cent refund on their property taxes.

Program costs $10M more than city planned for

In recent years, it's been a popular program, much more so than the city envisioned.

The city only budgeted $7 million for the program, but in the last two years received over 900 applications for the rebate each year, worth $17 million. A majority of the properties are in the core of the city, according to the treasurer's office.

But earlier this year, the province announced it would allow municipalities to manage the rebate programs however they liked. However, cities must still formally request a regulatory change from the province by July 1.

Next Tuesday,city council's finance and economic development committee will discuss the plan toreducethe rebate for both classes of property owners to 20 per cent in 2017, down to 10 per cent in 2018 and then to eliminate it altogether in 2019.

A staff report suggests that the rebate is unfair, as it is only applicable toempty offices, stores and industrial buildings, but not to residential ones.

"This is in effect a tax subsidy available to some but paid for by all," the report said.