The problem with unelected people on city committees - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 08:26 PM | Calgary | -11.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
OttawaAnalysis

The problem with unelected people on city committees

The debate over the personal beliefs of a new citizen transit commissioner underlines the problem with appointing unelected people to council committees.

Councillor denied spot on transit commission, 4th place finisher gets appointed

Coun. Shawn Menard wanted Michael Olsen's appointment to the transit commission reviewed due to his beliefs on abortion and climate change. (CBC)

DoMichael Olsen's personal beliefs about abortion have any bearing on whether he should be appointed to the transit commission? Of course not.

What about the fact he doesn't want to answer whether he thinks climate change is caused by humans?

After all, the LRT is being touted as the city's bestway to curb greenhouse gas emissions, andOC Transpois piloting electric buses in the next few years. So that'strickier.

Either way, you don't get to decide if it matters.

A panel of city officials selectedthe four citizen appointees to the transit commission, and council ultimately approved them.

They areunelected citizensandthey don't answer or at least, don't have to answer to the public.

No accountability from citizen commissioners

It was Coun. Shawn Menardwho raised concerns about Olsen, a federal public servant who lives in Kanata and has been a daily transit user for 25 years.

He also ran unsuccessfully for the Ottawa Catholic School Boardin last fall's election, when he answered a survey for the Campaign Life Coalition in whichhe saidhe believed women should not have access to abortions.

Olsen's views on the subject are his right, and Menard'smotion that his nomination be reconsidered based on these revelations was ill-considered.

He knew it, too. Because after council, Menard told reporters that "the bigger point here, I think, is the denial of climate change and being on the transit commission, which doesn't make any sense."

Olsen politely refused aninterview with both CBC News and CBC Radio'sAll In A Day (after showing initial enthusiasm) because transit commission chairCoun. Allan Hubleypreferred he didn't speak to media before an orientation session with OC Transpo.

Hubley, however, has no power to prevent commissioners from speaking to reporters, and two other commissioners did indeed speak with All In ADay host Alan Neal Wednesday afternoon.

When reporters asked Olsen directly whether he believes climate change is caused by humans, he said he did not see the relevance of the issue and declined further comment.

But Olsen's beliefs on climate change may well be pertinent.

Say the transit commissioners are voting on whether OC Transposhould buy electric buses an issue that is likely to come up this term.

Would Olsen's vote be swayed by personal feelings?

It will be hard to tell, just like it's difficult sometimes to discern thethinking behind a councillor's vote.

Transit commission chair, Kanata South Coun. Allan Hubley, was on the selection committee for citizen transit commissioners. (Laura Osman/CBC)

But here's the thing: we elected councillors. We vetted their views on the world, which were out in the open and fair game, and we voted in people who, as much as possible, reflect our own values.

We don't get to do that with citizen members of the transit commission.

These public commissioners who are not paid, despite being asked to think deeply about a vital city service don't answer to the public,even though they have the same powers as elected councillorswho overseea $500-million OC Transpobudgetand a transitnetwork that incudes the soon-to-be-rolling LRT system.

Councillor out, failed candidate in

It's difficult not to alsosee some politics at play in Wednesday's selections.

Two of the four new commissionersran unsuccessfully in last fall's electiondetails their official bios don't mention raisingquestions about whether the role is seen as a political stepping stone.

What may be most egregious is the appointmentof Anthony Carricato.

Not that there's anything objectionable aboutCarricatohimself he's a longtime staffer for the Speaker of the House of Commons and a Glebe-based community activist well-versed in city issues, if only an "occasional" transit user.

He also ran against Menard inlast October's municipal election.

Anthony Carricato, who ran unsuccessfully in Capital ward last fall, was appointed to the transit commission, while Menard, who was actually elected, was denied a seat. (CBC)

Think about thatfor a minute.

Shawn Menardwas actually elected by the people of Capital ward. He rankedbeing on the planning committee and transit commission as his first and second priorities requests that were both denied by the mayor.

Meanwhile, his competitor Carricato who came in fourth in a field of five candidateshas been appointed to the commission.

This situation is surely an affrontto many of the voters of Capital ward who duly elected Menard as their representative.

Instead, they are being represented on transit commission by eight councillors from other wardsand four citizens about whom we know little,and who are not accountable to the public.

Having so-called citizen members of the transit commission may seem like a progressive move in theory, but it ends up being a disavowalof democracy.