Nixing Safe Third Country agreement could reduce refugee smugglers, advocate says - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 02:55 PM | Calgary | -10.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Saskatchewan

Nixing Safe Third Country agreement could reduce refugee smugglers, advocate says

Canada's hypothetical withdrawal from the Safe Third Country agreement would benefit refugees attempting to seek asylum in Canada, says one advocate.

Canada withdrawing from agreement 'clear and easy solution' to illegal border crossings

Family members from Somalia are helped into Canada by RCMP officers along the U.S.-Canada border near Hemmingford, Que., on Friday, February 17, 2017. A number of refugee claimants are braving the elements to illicitly enter Canada. (Paul Chiasson/THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Canada's withdrawal from the Safe Third Country agreement would be a "clear and easy solution" to the number of people seeking asylum in the country through illegal border crossings, says one advocate.

Janet Dench is the executive director of the Canadian Council for Refugees. Dench spoke with CBC Radio'sAfternoon Editionafter a Regina woman faced a smuggling charge. The womanwas apprehended with nine foreign nationals from West Africa atthe North Portal border crossing.

Dench said the agreement creates opportunity for smugglers to profit circumstances she alleges the federal government knew werepossiblebefore the agreement was even signed into law.

"Unfortunately, the reality around the world is that many times, refugees do have to depend upon smugglers to help them get across the barriers that are put up," Dench said.

The barrier in Canada's case is the agreement, which mandates refugees coming from the U.S.seeking asylum in Canada would be turned away at formal border crossings and potentially deported. If refugees arein the U.S., that's where they are to make a claim first.

If the border is crossed illegally, then the refugees can make their claim in Canada instead.

"Of course, refugees are routinely right around the world taken advantage of by people who are trying to make a quick buck," Denchsaid, referring to the agreement as unnecessary.

If the agreement was nixed, she said people could travel to formal crossings and have their claim heard and processed under Canadian law.

By doing that, smuggling business could be reduced andrefugees wouldn't have to freeze crossing illegally such as the case inEmerson, Man.

"Everybody would benefit," she said.

The biggest risk is refugees who do not know they can cross the border without having to hire smugglers, Dench said.

"There's always going to be people who will take advantage of desperate people and take money from them."

With files from CBC Radio's Afternoon Edition