Sask premier says school pronoun policy based on wide consultation, but judge says there's no evidence of that

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe is reiteratinghis claim that his government's school pronoun policy was based on extensive consultations with parents, teachers and others, but a judge saysthere's no evidence thoseoccurred.

Moe's comments Friday came one day after ReginaCourt of King's Bench Justice Michael Megawplaced an injunction on the controversial policy, which would require parental consent for all students under 16 to change their names or pronouns at school.

Moe has pledgedto reconvene the legislature Oct. 10 to invoke the notwithstanding clause and overrule Megaw's decision.

Speaking at a Saskatoon leisure centre Friday morning, Moe said the policy was based on"multiple conversations various government MLAs have had with parents, educators, others, andmyself included as an MLA."

Megawpainted a different picture in his ruling.

"There is no indication...that the [Education] Ministrydiscussed this new Policy with any potential interested parties such as teachers, parents, or students," he wrote.

"There is further no indication any expert assistance was enlisted to assist in determining the effect of the Policy. Finally, there is no indication the Ministry sought any legal assistance to determine the constitutionality of the Policy with respect to any potential considerations regarding the Charter."

WATCH | Moe not backing down from pronoun policy despite injunction:

Sask. premier doubles down on school pronoun policy, bypassing courts

1 year ago

Duration 2:04

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe is doubling down on his promise to use the notwithstanding clause to enact his government's school pronoun policy, even after a judge granted an injunction halting it. Critics say he's ignoring real harm that could be done to students.

Moe was asked why the government didn't provide evidence of anyconsultations orresearch.

"The case hasn't been heard yet. That evidence would ultimatelybe forthcoming, I would presume. I'm not a lawyer," he said.

"I don't know the period of time legal counsel had to introduce evidence at what was an injunction hearing, not the main court case. I'll leave what happens in the courtroom to the lawyers."

Moe said the notwithstanding clause is necessary to "provide clarity" to families, teachers and school divisions on the issue. He said this is about"the rights of a parent to ensure they are involved in their child's decision.

One constitutional expert says the legal battle could be far from over.

"There are very motivated parties on both sides," said Eric Adams, aprofessor in the faculty of law at the University of Alberta.

"The importance of the governmental policy is outweighed by the public interest of not exposing that minority of students to the potentially irreparable harm and mental health difficulty of being unable to find expression for their gender identity," stated the decision.

Adams said that if the government invokes the notwithstanding clause as planned, that won't be the end of the fight.

The other side can then seek another injunction if they feel the government made constitutional errors.

"I suspect there will be continuing legal opposition. They may or may not seek a second injunction," saidAdam Goldenberg, a partner with McCarthy Ttrault and legal counsel forUR Pride,which filed the initial injunction request.

If that second injunction request proves successful, the government can then appeal it, he said.

Obtaining a second injunction could prove difficult, but not impossible, he said. Canadian courts have taken a "hands off approach" to notwithstanding clause use in the past, he said. In fact, courts havenever overruled provincial governments' use ofthe clause, as long as the rules were followed, he said.

WATCH|Moe takes questions on school pronoun policy, notwithstanding clause:

Sask. premier takes questions on school pronoun policy, notwithstanding clause

1 year ago

Duration 9:14

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe took questions from reporters on Friday, a day after he said he would invoke the notwithstanding clause in support of his proposed school policy on gender pronouns. Moe's move came after a judge issued an injunction against the government's policy, pending a full hearing.

Even in a 1988 case where the Quebec government used the notwithstanding clause on every bill it was passing that session, the Supreme Court of Canada sided with the government.

However, "that was a long time ago,"and none of those justices remain on the Supreme Court, Adams said.

Goldenberg said the government policy cannot be enforced, for now. He said that's good news for Saskatchewan students.

"As of today, gender-diverse young people in Saskatchewan who have a trusted adult at school whom they want to respect them and recognize for their gender identity can have that trusted adult refer to them by their chosen name, their chosen pronouns, even if they haven't come out to their parents so don't have parental consent,"Goldenberg said.

"That's a good thing and that's the reality in Saskatchewan."

WATCH|UR Pride lawyer calls Moe's use of notwithstanding clause 'horrifying':

UR Pride lawyer calls Moe's use of notwithstanding clause 'horrifying'

1 year ago

Duration 6:12

Adam Goldenberg, lead counsel for UR Pride, speaks to CBC News Network after Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe said he would use the notwithstanding clause to override an injunction on his government's naming and pronoun policy. Goldenberg says Moe's use of an 'extraordinary' constitutional power is 'despicable' and sets a 'terrible precedent.'