Bid to toss charges against McGuinty staffers now in judge's hands

The Crown attempted to salvage its case on Tuesday against two senior aides to former Ontario premier Dalton McGuinty.

David Livingston, who was chief of staff duringMcGuinty's final months in power, and his deputy Laura Miller, are charged with mischief and illegal use of a computer.

• Key breach-of-trust charge at gas plants trial fizzles; 2 others in play
• Gas plant defence says 2 former McGuinty advisers 'ought to be acquitted'

Defence lawyers are asking the court to dismiss the charges for lack of evidence, seeking a directed verdict.Justice TimothyLipsonsaid he will announce his ruling on Thursday afternoon.

If the judge rejects the motion to acquit, the defence will have to start calling witnesses and mount a case.

In court on Tuesday, Crown prosecutor Tom Lemon said he is aiming to prove that Livingston and Miller did not have theproper authority to order the wipingof 20 computer hard drives in the premier's office in early 2013, just beforeMcGuintyhanded over to Premier KathleenWynne.

"The databeing wiped did not belong to them,"said Lemon.

The prosecutor pointed to earlier testimony indicating that the Liberal caucus not the premier's officepaid Miller's spouse, an IT consultant who did not work in the Ontario public service, nearly $10,000 to erase hard drives that belonged to thegovernment.

"They weren't authorized to wipe data on 20 computers that did not belong to them," said Lemon.

The efforts to wipethe hard drives in late January and early February 2013 came as a legislative committee and journalists sought internal documents about the decisions to cancel gas-fired power plants in Mississauga andOakville, moves that the auditor general estimates cost taxpayers more than $1 billion.

The defence argues the hard drives were wiped as a matter of routine to remove personal information from the computers of staff who were leaving the premier's office.

"There's no evidence of any records being destroyed," said Miller's lawyer ScottHutchison. "That's the crucial flawin the Crown's case."

Hutchisonalso argued thatemailsat issue in the case were about "political messaging" so did not need to be preserved under the rules for retaining government documents.

"If you look at theseemails, they are all political, they are all transient, and none of them would have had to be preserved," he said.

Hutchisonsaid the prosecution had opened its case by suggesting the pair had deleted thousands of documents as part of some "grand conspiracy."He said theemailsthe Crown pointed to as evidence of guilt simply reveal the obvious, that thegovernment's gas plants decision had been controversial.

Livingston's lawyer Brian Gover denied the pair had acted nefariously, stating the deleted emails were "political in nature." The law, Gover said, only required retention of records of long-term business value to the Ontario government, and the relevant emails about the fallout from the gas-plants decision didn't qualify.

Miller and Livingston have pleaded not guilty. The Crown dropped charges of breach of trust against the pair last Friday, saying there was no reasonable chance at a conviction.