'The matter can never be settled': The controversy over who wrote The Night Before Christmas

Note: This article was originally published in 2017

'Twasthe Night Before Christmas, butaccordingto lore,
Thisbelovedpoem was not written by Clement Clarke Moore.

At least that's the opinion of Mary VanDeusen, who claims hergreat-great-great-great-great-grandfather, Henry Livingston Jr., a poet andfarmer from aPoughkeepsie, N.Y.,is the true author of theiconicholiday verse.

For years, VanDeusenhas been doing her best to try to convince the public that her unheralded ancestor deserves credit for the legendary prose.

"To me, it's just righting awrong," she said."I feel there's something fundamentally wrong with people stealing other people's work."

It's a tough charge, but VanDuesenhas some academic ammunition to back up her claim.Just last year, MacDonald Jackson, English professoremeritus at the Universityof Auckland in New Zealand, published hisbookWho Wrote The Night Before Christmas? Analyzing the Clement Clarke Moore vs. Henry Livingston Question.

"The best evidence favouring Livingston is hard to explain away," he wrote in an email to CBCNews.

Additionally, in 2000,forensic linguist and Vassar College English professor Donald Fosterconcluded in his book, Author Unknkown, that Livingston authoredthe poem.

The case has also sparked at least two jovial mock trials in Troy, N.Y. one in 2013, which ended in a hung jury, and another the following yearin which a jury ruled that Livingston was the real author.

Yet despite the support for Livingston's authorship, Van Deusen, who has created a densely detailed website about the issue, says it still makes her "very, very sad that [the] truth isn't easy to get out there."

The Moore camp

Not surprisingly, there are those who dispute the professors' andVanDeusen'stake.

Responding to Foster's book,Stephen Nissenbaum, professor emeritus of history at theUniversity of Massachusetts, wrote an article in defence of Moore back in 2001.

Seth Kaller, an expert on authenticating historical documents, saidthe matter was in "Obama birth certificate territory."

• How this woman reacted to finding a letter she wrote to Santa 50 years ago

"Yes, there is a controversy.... The controversy is why so many people are still questioning the authenticity of something indisputably proven to be true."

(Kaller also hired noted skepticandparanormal investigator Joe Nickell,who also came to the conclusion that Moore is the author.)

"There is literally no contemporary evidence that Livingston ever claimed to beor was the author.He didn't, and he wasn't," saidKaller, who at one time owned an original manuscript of the poem said to be in Moore's handwriting.

What we know for sure

What we do know isthis:Account of aVisit from St. Nicholas as it was first calledwas originally published, anonymously, in New York'sTroy Sentinel newspaper on Dec.23, 1823.

Not only didthe poem become a hit, butaccordingtothe New York HistoricalSociety, its descriptionof oldSt. Nick"permanently connected St. Nicholas to Christmasand led to our idea of Santa Claus." (It also establishedthe names of Santa's eight tiny reindeerall except for Rudolph.)

For 14 years, the author of the poem would remain unknown. Then in1837, American author and poet Charles Fenno Hoffman,editor ofThe New-York Book of Poetry,outed his friend Moore, a New York scholar and author, as the writer. In1844, Moore would finally acknowledge authorship when he included the poem in his collection entitledPoems.

Moore was a professor of Middle Eastand Greek literature and theologywho wrote on a variety of subjects and had many of his works published, includinga two-volumeA Compendious Lexicon of the Hebrew Language.

Livingston, according to thePoetry Foundation,published "occasional and light verse in regional journals and his poems were often published anonymously or under the pseudonym R."

Moore and Livingston never met, and the latter died in 1828, years before Moore would ever take credit for the poem.

The story ofhow the poem came to be remains a source of controversy.

As the story goes, Moorewrote itas a Christmas presentfor his two daughters. Heapparently told the New York Historical Society that a "portly, rubicund Dutchman in the neighborhood" washis model for St. Nicholas.

How the poemended up at theTroy Sentinel is not exactly clear, but some claim a friend of the Moore family sent it in.

Yet the Livingston familyclaimed that the very same poem had been told to Livingston Jr.'s own children years earlier, in 1807.

Linguistic analysis

In part, Donald Foster used linguistic analysis to back up those claims, while MacDonald Jackson based hisconclusionson statistical analysis. Hecomparedthe writing styles of both Livingston and Moore andcontrastedtheir rates of usingcommon words and phoneme pairs words that differ only by one sound.

"Their rates of use are largely beyond a writer's conscious control," Jackson wrote in his book."They distinguish Moore's verse from Livingston's, and they classify The Night Before Christmas with the latter."

For Moore to have written this poem, he would have to "slipped into a style that was not only atypical of his ownverse but utterly typical of the very man who, according to his descendants, was the true author."

As well, Jackson argued, Moore was a dull"moralist, a pedagogueand satirist" whodid not have the "verve, imagination, humour, whimsy" of Livingston to write such a poem.

'Quite likely that the matter can never be settled'

But Kallerbelieves this is all nonsense. Those same traits could be said about Livingston, he said.

And the case for Moore is simple:

"He wrote four manuscript copies that he signed;people who knew him while he was alive credited him with authorship. He published a book claiming to be the author, and there is absolutely nothing that anybody related to the Livingston claims has ever found that provides any proof that Livingston claimed to write it,or did write it."

As for the statistical analysis done by Jackson, Kallersaidthe professor's data is constrained by the limited written texts available.

He said Jackson is unfair to Moore,choosing poems written byLivingston that, when compared withThe Night Before Christmas, would lead to the conclusion hewrote thepoem.

"Want to read some of Moore's poems?I can cherry pick a few, after which you would say, of course Moore wrote A Visit."

The controversy has swirled since the 19th century, and Jackson doesn't see an end to it any time soon.

"It's quite likely that the matter can never be settled."

• Santa Claus is coming to town! Kris Kringle spotted in some strange places