Ex-national chief who helped create Assembly of First Nations says organization now 'in limbo'

The Assembly of First Nations has lost its way and is now "in limbo," having over its 40-year history slowly come under the influence of the Liberal Party of Canada, says the former national chief who createdit.

Del Riley was the last president of the National Indian Brotherhood, serving one consequential term between 1980 and 1982, where he tackled reforms that transformed the brotherhood into today's AFN.

He did itwhile simultaneously helping entrenchIndigenous rights in Canada's Constitution, jousting daily with then-prime minister Pierre Trudeau and his attorney general, a lawyer from Shawinigan, Que., named Jean Chrtien.

Today, the 79-year-old Riley says the raft of internal struggles facing the AFN from defamation lawsuits and human resources probes to a forensic audit and political power jockeying can be traced to the continued influence of the Indian Act.

"They're just operating in a state of total confusion, which means they aren't going to make much progress," Riley said.

"They're airing their dirty laundry, and all that does is make them look tremendously weaker. They have that appearance to us out here."

Riley, of Chippewas of the Thames near London, Ont., is a survivor. He spent his early years in a tuberculosis sanatoriumbefore Mounties hauled him off to the Mohawk Institute residential school near Brantford, Ont.

Riley was elected National Indian Brotherhood president in 1980, succeeding Noel Starblanket of Saskatchewanwho laid the groundwork for Riley, landing the new presidentright in the middle of the fierce, ongoing constitutional fight.

WATCH | Del Riley elected leader of National Indian Brotherhood:

Delbert Riley on constitutional talks, The National Aug. 13, 1980

2 years ago

Duration 2:00

Del Riley, newly elected head of the National Indian Brotherhood, says Indigenous people have more right to participate in constitutional talks than the provinces.

Described as a hardliner on the issue,Riley took $200,000 from the brotherhood's federal grant moneyin November 1980 and established a permanent ambassadorial office in London to urgeBritish politicians to oppose patriationof the Constitution.

Back in Canada a month later, the brotherhood hosted an all-chiefs conference in Ottawa the second of three that sparked the eventual creation of the AFN.

Overthe next year,Trudeau and Chrtien relented.Indigenous and treaty rights were enshrined in the Constitution. And in April 1982, at another all-chiefs conference in Penticton, B.C., the chiefs in assembly formally created the AFN.

David Ahenakew of Saskatchewan became the first modern national chief, spoiling Riley's bid for re-election.

Riley was optimistic the new Constitution and new organization would spark change, but, looking back, he saidneither had the hoped-for effect.

"The other problem AFN has is it's really an organization of Indian Act chiefs and councils, controlled totally by the minister," he said.

"When I put Section 35 in the Constitution, I put it in to protect the traditional chiefs and that First Nations authority."

He imagined enshrining Indigenous rights in the highest law of the land would ensure traditional governance systems and the democratic power of First Nations people would triumph over the Indian Act,but he saidthe old legislationstill looms large.

"Today, we still sit at the bottom of the social ladder here without any real hope for the future unless our people can learn what the real truth is and revive their real strength, which comes from each individual on that First Nation, and not from their Indian Act chief and council," he said.

"That's where the authority lay."

AFN not 'much of a player' anymore: professor

Today's AFN today is hard-pressed on several fronts, with a rare emergency chiefs assembly toaddress a backlog of issuesslated for thisspring.

National Chief RoseAnne Archibald, the first woman to win the job, faces lawsuits and misconduct complaints that threaten to derail herreform-oriented agenda, whichincludes changing the AFN's legal name stillthe National Indian Brotherhood Corp. ridding it of the old organization's last remnant.

Veldon Coburn, a political scientist at the University of Ottawa and member of Algonquins of Pikwkanagn, says the Riley- and Starblanket-era days of high-risk political brinkmanship are now just memories.

He saidthe last two decades saw the rise of"milquetoast politicians" at the AFN leaders who hesitate to criticize and leap at the chance for photo-ops, but avoidpolitically tense issues of sovereignty and nationhood.

"Anything like you might have seen in the 1980s has long since passed, and it doesn't seem much of a player in national politics in Canada," he said.

Coburn points to national chief Ovide Mercredi's 1996 burning of prime minister Chrtien's Liberal election platform document, known as the red book, as amoment things changed.

"See how easy it burns," Mercredi quipped as he held the flaming pages.

It was a symbolic act of resistance, Coburn said, but it didn't go unpunished. Ron Irwin, Chrtien's minister of Indian Affairs, fought back.

Irwin headed for Manitoba, Mercredi's home province and power base, to meet with an up-and-coming Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs boss named Phil Fontaine.

Fontaine ousted Mercredi in the 1997 national chief election, and later served two consecutive terms between 2003 and 2009. His critics branded him too cozy with the Liberals, but Fontaine won on a platform of results-focused pragmatism.

That's the approach from which Coburn saidthe two last national chiefs, Shawn Atleo of B.C. and Perry Bellegarde of Saskatchewan, didn't deviate.

'Go back to the roots'

Kanahus Manuel, a KtunaxaandSecwepemc activist with the Tiny House Warriors based near Blue River, B.C., comes from a family with a long history of involvement with the organization.

Her grandfather George Manuel was the brotherhood's secondpresident. Her father Arthur Manuel and uncle Bobby Manuel led protests against the constitutional patriation.

She saidthe chiefs were more grassroots then, but today she sees leaders wary of criticizing government policy for fear of "getting the federal strings cut." As a result, she saidpeople question what the AFN is up to.

"We've got to remember and go back to the roots of that organization," she said.

"The only way that we're going to have a voice is not through the AFN. It's through national mobilization, going international to expose the continued human rights violations."

Coburn saidone way to do that is to continue the reforms Starblanket and Riley undertook andfurther democratize the AFN so regular people can vote for the national chief, instead of only member chiefs.

And if they want advice from an elder statesman, Riley saidhe's a phone call away.