Sixties Scoop survivor files Alberta law society complaint against lawyer on healing foundation board

One of the lawyers appointed to sit on a healing foundation created by the Sixties Scoop settlement agreement is facing a law society complaint in Alberta from a Sixties Scoop survivor.

Peter Van Name, 47, filed a complaint against Saskatchewan lawyer Tony Merchant, of Merchant Law Group, on Wednesday with the Law Society of Alberta, according to a copy of the complaint provided to CBC News.

Van Name's complaint states he is seeking to have Merchant disbarred.

The $875 million Sixties Scoop settlement agreementsets aside $750 million for all status First Nations and Inuit children placed into foster care oradopted by a non-Indigenous parent between 1951 and 1991.

Merchant was appointed as one of the founding members of the $50 million Sixties Scoop Healing Foundation created by the agreement. The remaining$75 million of the settlement is earmarkedfor lawyers' fees.

The healing foundation, which also includes Federal Court Justice Michel Shore as a director, was incorporated days before Shore approved the settlement agreement on May 11 followinghearings in Saskatoon.

Shore's involvement in approving a deal he also brokered is the subject of a separate judicial complaint filed by another Sixties Scoop survivor.

Merchant filed a Sixties Scoop claim on behalf of Van Name in Alberta in 2011. Van Name's case was included in the Sixties Scoop agreement-in-principlefinalized in November 2017.

"He never told me anything that was going on," said Van Name, in an interview with CBC News.

"He doesn't tell his clients anything."

Van Name said his mother was forced to give him up for adoption by Catholic nuns in Edmonton. He said his mom had run away from Holy Angels Indian Residential School in Fort Chipewyan, Alta., and had sought refuge with the nuns.

Van Nameis Mikisew Cree and was adopted out to a family in New Jersey.

Susan Bourassa, Merchant's assistant, said the lawyer did not know anything about the complaint.

"You will have to wait until he finds out something about the complaint," said Bourassa.

'He has not acted in good faith'

Van Name's Law Society of Alberta complaint is based on concerns outlined in a letter he sent on Tuesday to the Federal Courtseeking to make submissions on the $37.5 million in fees three law firms involved with the federal portion of the settlement agreement are seeking to receive.Merchant Law Group is one of the three.

The fees were deemed "excessive" by Ontario Superior Court Justice Edward Belobaba.

Federal Court Justice Michael Phelan is expected to rule on the fee issue soon. The matter was de-linked from the settlement agreement.

Van Name said the statement of claim filed on his behalf by Merchant in Alberta did not reflect what he told the law firm.

Van Name said he instructed Merchant toamend his claim in October 2017 but therequest was ignored. Van Name said he fired Merchant a few months later and the law firm returnedhis documentation in March.

"His lack of care and professional misconduct obviously has been overlooked by all the parties as he has not acted in good faith in representing my interests," he wrote.

Van Name said he paid Merchant $2,000 to take on his case in 2000 and heard from his office only a handful of times in the years thatfollowed.

"The law group never even met with me. They always had me sending stuff in their office about my adoption and stuff like that," said Van Name, in an interview.

Allegation supported by Federal Court filing

Van Name's allegation that Merchant did little on his casefor years is supported by filings submitted to the Federal Court by Koskie Minsky, which is another of the law firms party to the settlement agreement.

An April 27, 2017letter signed byKoskieMinsky partner KirkBaertallegesMerchant did little to advance Van Name's case in the courts for five years after filing his claim on Aug. 18, 2011.

The letter was part of a heated squabble between Toronto-basedKoskieMinsky, Merchant Law Group and Vancouver-based Klein Lawyers before the Federal Court over the Sixties Scoop case. The three firms eventually agreed to jointly negotiate the settlement agreement.

In the letter, Koskie Minsky stated that it took "considerable issue" with Merchant and Klein "being permitted to represent class members...due to years of wasted time and resources and inaction in their various provincially filed 'Sixties Scoop' cases," according to the letter.

David Klein, managing partner for Klein Lawyers, could not be reached for comment.

In another Sixties Scoop legal battle before theManitoba court, KoskieMinsky said the Merchant Law Group and Tony Merchant had been "repeatedly sanctioned by the courts" for "conflicts of interest, unethical behaviour and deceitful misconduct," according to June 2016 filings.

Baert said in an email to CBC News the issue wasamatter of "ancient history" and "once negotiations began all of the firms contributed in a significant way."

Van Name said he doesn't support the settlement agreement or the richnessof the lawyer fees.

"The lawyers that want to put their hands into this thing, all they want is the money," said Van Name.

A total of $75 million was originally set aside for lawyerfees in the settlement agreement. They were to be split 50-50 between the three law firms handling the Federal Court portion of the deal and the two law firms handling the Ontario portion.

The Law Society of Alberta did not return a request for comment.

MORE FROM CBCINDIGENOUS:

• Ontario deletes 'offensive' posts from internal employee debate over John A. Macdonald statue removal
• 'More was required of Canada': Ruling shows where Ottawa fell short with First Nations on Trans Mountain