United We Roll wasn't just about oil and gas. Scheer knew that and worked the crowd anyway

Many of the participants in last week'sUnited We Roll convoy said they were there to unite Canadians around a pipeline. Others had more specific goals: to see the Liberal government cancel billsC-69andC-48, which critics charge will act as enormous industry obstacles.

But as several observersnotedwatching the convoy make its way to Ottawa from Alberta, United We Roll had also become a space for far-right groups to spew racism and xenophobia.Signs denouncing open borders, protesting Canada signing on to the global migration pact and accusing the prime minister of treason hung alongside signs supporting pipelines. Some convoy participants wore hats that said "Make Canada Great Again," a nod to U.S. President Donald Trump's slogan that has become associated with denigrating Mexicans, asylum seekers and banning Muslims from entering the U.S.

Because the convoy has become affiliated with such unsettling rhetoric, unwavering support from high-profile Conservative politicians such as Conservative leader AndrewScheer, who addressed the group last week is troubling, and could potentially hurt the party's chances in the upcoming fall election.

Tapping into frustration

It's clear why Conservative politicians would want to support the rally. With seemingly endless controversy swirling around Prime Minister JustinTrudeauand his role in pressuring (or not) former Attorney GeneralJodyWilson-RaybouldoverSNC-Lavalin, the Conservatives surely want to seize the opportunity to marry new political scandal with longstanding frustration over pipeline inertia. And withMaximeBerniertrying to make inroads with the further right areas of the party's base, Conservatives need to show unwavering support for western Canada, pipelines and the oil and gas industry.

ButScheerought to have made a distinction between his support for Canadian oil workers, and support for the racism and violence that has been associated withUnited We Roll. Conservative Senator DavidTkachukeven told the crowd to "roll over" Liberals across the country, and he has since refused to apologize.

• Controversial convoy rolls back to Alberta as some wonder: Did the message get lost?

• What people are saying at the United We Roll protest

The rally has also been associated with Yellow Vests Canada, a group whoseFacebookpage is rife withracist and xenophobic views, particularly towards Muslims and immigrants.In fact, the United We Rollconvoy was originally named the Yellow Vest Convoy, but was changeddue to the obviously problematic association.

Members of the Yellow Vests CanadaFacebookgrouphave advocated for MPIqraKhalidto be deported, called visible minorities sub-human and scum, and made death threats against the prime minister. Despite that, United We Roll lead organizer GlenCarrittimplied that everyone would be welcometoattend ("It doesn't matter you can wear a yellow vest, or blue coveralls or blackhardhator suit and tie," hesaid) and Yellow Vest organizer MarkFriesenwas indeed in attendance.

One of the speakers at the rally was FaithGoldy, who was fired from Rebel Media after appearing on a neo-Nazipodcast, and who regularlybemoansthe erosion of "white identity."Scheerspoke on the same platform that she did, ignoring what should be a toxicassociation.

Withrecent pollsshowing the Conservatives are in a position to form government, the party needs to start clarifying what, exactly, it stands for.

Before the last federal election in 2015, Conservatives were riding high in the polls and a renewed government was within reach. But in late September and early October, the Conservatives doubled-down on their previous decision to ban theniqabin citizenship ceremonies and pledged to implement a tip line for"barbaric cultural practices." Almost a week after this announcement, Conservatives declined in the polls and never recovered.

The unwillingness to address or even acknowledge these racist and xenophobic undercurrents in United We Roll plays right into progressive messaging that the party is too cozy with the far-right. It also puts the party at risk of alienating centrists in swing ridings who would otherwise be open to voting for Conservatives, but are hesitant to align themselves with a party that refuses to even acknowledge (never mind denounce) hateful views.

It could also point to an absence of political courage. During the presidential election in 2008, Republican JohnMcCaindefendedBarackObamaagainst racist questions from audience members during a town hall event.Scheercould just as easily have spoken at the United We Roll rally by telling protestors he supports their efforts with regards to the oil and gas industry, while simultaneously chastising the racist and xenophobic rhetoric that was circulating.

Instead,Scheersimply stated: "We're standing with you."

That made it easy for critics to paint Conservatives as bowing to pressures of the far-right. The question for Canadians now becomes, are the Conservatives out of touch, or willfully ignoring this rhetoric? And if elected prime minister, wouldScheerremain silent if people continue to publicly spew this hate?

The Conservatives' failure to draw a line in the sand between legitimate grievances about the oil and gas industry and illegitimate grievances about immigrants, Muslims and minorities will ultimately hamper the party's ability to reconnect with voters in diverse urban and suburban communities across the country. Voters they will desperately need to win October's election.

This column is part ofCBC'sOpinion section.For more information about this section, please readourFAQ.