At Issue: Liberals on the defensive on electoral reform, internal issues

At Issue panelists Andrew Coyne,ChantalHbert and Althia Raj joined Peter Mansbridge on Thursday to take on the Liberal government's response this week on two major fronts, a concession to the opposition parties on the issue of electoral reform and the resignation of Hunter Tootoo from the Liberal cabinet and caucus.

At the NDP's long-held suggestion, seats on the electoral committee will be allotted proportionally according to the popular vote in last year's federal election instead of the current seat count, it was announced Thursday. As a result, the majority of the 12-person committee will be non-Liberals.

• Liberals back down on electoral reform committee
• The Pollcast: Liberals shift on electoral reform what now?
• ANALYSIS l Let the politicians keep talking, Supreme Court settled assisted death debate

National Postcolumnist Coyne said that while somewhat of a symbolic move the Liberals, after all, weren't obliged to do anything it "sends the right signals when previously they were sending the wrong signals."

Toronto Star columnist Hbert said the Liberals will need to get one or more opposition parties on side with their plans for reforms, not likely the Conservatives, in order to avoid a national referendum on the issue. Ultimately, it will be the NDP who will face the pivotal decision on whether to sign off on a Liberal idea or punt it, she argued.

Raj,Huffington Post Canada's Ottawa bureau chief said that, combined with missteps on setting the parameters of House of Commons debate and trying to push through assisted-death legislation, it has dented the brand of transparency and co-operativeness espoused in last year's election

Tootoo, the minister of fisheries, oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard, is battling addiction issues, it was announced this week.

The panel grappled with the seemingly unusual removal of Tootoo from caucus and prime minister Justin Trudeau's noncommittal responses as to whether the member from Nunavut would be welcomed back into caucus in the future should he make progress confronting his issues.

"If if there's nothing there, they're going out of their way to make it seem like there's something there," Coyne said.

As to whether privacy should trump full disclosure, Hebert was unequivocal, arguing his constituents should be able to know what's going on with their member of parliament.