'Uncertainty is never a good thing': MPs, senators reach out to U.S. lawmakers

Canadian MPs and senators plan to stress the importance of trade when they meet with their U.S. counterparts in the weeks following Donald Trump's inauguration as president.

Members of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group are expected to gather in Washingtonsometime before springfor wide-rangingtalks on issues important to both countries.

But trade will bethe biggest concern for Canadian officials.

"Our economies are inter-linked through supply chains, and when one does well, the other does well. So we need to keep that in mind, both on our sideand theirs," said Liberal MP Wayne Easter, who co-chairs the group.

• ANALYSIS |'Underestimated' Trump could change the rules on trade
• ANALYSIS | 'Not a target ... not an ally': What Trump presidency could mean for Canadian economy

"If they'regoingto do well, we're part of their doing well, and people need to understand that," Easter told CBC News during an interview in his office.

The group brings Canadian MPs and senators together with their American counterparts in the U.S. House of Representatives andSenate. Members typically discuss issues of commonconcern as a way to strengthen ties between countries.

"I guess I'll put it this way, I think our role has become much more intensive," Easter said about the group's workin the wake of Trump's election win.

The president-elect hasdescribed NAFTAas a disasterand has called for the free-tradedeal to be renegotiated. Trump's nominee for commerce secretary, Wilbur Ross, said "NAFTA is logically the first thing for us to deal with" duringhis confirmation hearingon Wednesday.

Easter described Wilbur's testimony as "interesting to say the least," adding "it provokes some concern."

'Collateral damage'

While Trump's anti-trade rhetoric has been aimed mostly at Mexico, there are renewed warnings that changes to NAFTA could have consequences for Canada.

"Usually if you're talking about renegotiating an existing trade agreement, the idea would be to negotiate it to make it work better for both sides, to make trade flow more smoothly ... but I don't think that's what the U.S. has in mind," said MatthewKronby, a trade lawyer and partner atBennett Jones LLP.

Mexico may be the target of rule changes, but KronbyaddsCanada could end up as"collateral damage."

"We've got integrated supply chains throughout North America, and attempts to restrict trade with Mexico can also affect Canadian exporters to the U.S."

• Why Trump's new trade repcould take a 'hard line' with Canada
• ANALYSIS|If Trump closes door on Mexico, Canada can thrive by keeping it open

But Easter has a different concern about some of the anti-trade rhetoric he's hearing from U.S. officials.

"They've been using this line that all the jobs are being lost because of Mexico, and other trading relationships. The jobs are really being lost more because of technology more than anything else," Easter said.

He did acknowledge some employers are moving to countries where labour is cheap and environmental standards are lax, but he insisted technology is a major factor changing the workforce.

Easter also urgedfellow Canadian legislatorsto look at the big picture when it comes to the new U.S. administration.

"Uncertainty is never a good thing. I think that's what we have to try and move through the next six months:re-establish some certainty in terms of our trading relationships, and our relationshipswith the rest of the world."