Naming and shaming hecklers in the House of Commons

"Order, please!"

On a sunny day in June, the noise on the floor of the House of Commons as MPs read out statements is like that of a busy cafeteria. In the gallery above sit a few dignitaries, tourists in shorts holding ear pieces to the sides of their sweating heads, a class of elementary school students on a field trip, and a handful of journalists.

The ear pieces are a necessity. Without them, it is impossible to hear what an MP on the floor is saying.

• To reform Parliament, MPs might start by holding their applause
• Speaker Geoff Reganmore vocal than predecessors in search of House civility

This is not something that comes throughon television. The microphones placed on the desks of MPs do their jobs impressively well. The House of Commons is a verynoisy place, even beforequestion period gets started.

And then come the heckles.

Some heckles have substance, pointing out contradictions or errors in a government member's answer. But most are less substantive exaggerated laughter, theatrical groans, schoolyardinsults. AfewConservative MPs on this June daymocked the prime minister when he stumbled over the pronunciation of "collaboratively."

"Big words!" yelled two of them.

Heckles can easily drown out whoever is speaking, and beating back the wall of derisive sound coming from across the aisle is not for the faint of heart.

But Geoff Regan, the Speaker of the House of Commons, has taken a new approach to heckling, one that previous Speakers have eschewed.

He has called them out.

On 25 occasions when Parliament was last sitting before the summer recess, Regan interrupted question period to bring the House to order, calling out a heckling MP by the name of his riding (MPs cannot be identified by their actualnames in the House).

The goal is to name and shame MPs into better behaviour andimprove decorum in the House, a goal that Regan will continue to strive towards as the next sitting of Parliamentbegins today.

Who's beingnamed?

Over the last sitting, two Conservative MPs got the lash from Regan most often.

Ed Fast, MP for the B.C. riding of Abbotsford, and Steven Blaney, MP for the Quebec riding of BellechasseLes EtcheminsLvis, were each called out by Regan three times.

Chris Warkentin (Grande PrairieMackenzie)and Michael Cooper (St. AlbertEdmonton)were both named twice.

In all, Regan called out Conservative MPs in the House 20 times over 77 sitting days.

He also rebukedthree New Democrats and two of his fellow Liberals.

Every MP that Regan has named and shamed has been a male.

Men tend to do the bulk of heckling in the House.

Who's being heckled?

While 100 per cent of the MPs reprimandedby Regan were men, 32 per cent of the MPs being heckled defined as who was last speaking before Regan named aheckler were women. That is, however, a lower share than the proportion of women holding cabinet or parliamentary secretary positions in the Liberal government.

The most frequently heckled MPs in the last sittingwere Foreign Affairs MinisterStphane Dionand Minister of Democratic InstitutionsMaryam Monsef, who were each heckled four times. Finance Minister Bill Morneau,his parliamentary secretary Franois-Philippe Champagne, then-government House Leader Dominic LeBlanc, Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan,and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau were each heckled twice.

But that is only the tip of the iceberg, those times when Reganinterrupted debate to call out an MP.

As any observation of question period will reveal, plenty of heckling goes unpunished.

That is because it is difficult to identify individual hecklers. The House of Commons is an echo chamber (literally and, at times, figuratively) and when multiple MPs are hurling invective at their opponents it is virtually impossible to single any of them out.

The Speaker also sits at one end of the House of Commons, a vantage point that is less than ideal for his work. This was one of the reasonsPeter Milliken, who was Speaker between 2001 and 2011, did not name and shame MPs for heckling, as MPs sitting closer to the Speaker have a disadvantage.

Perhaps that is why two-thirds of the MPs called out by Reganhave beenthose sitting in the front two benches. Nevertheless, in an apparent bid for fairness, Regan has called out some MPs sitting at the other end of the House.

Hold your applause

Regan'snew approach to heckling was not the only attempt to improve decorum in the House over the last sitting. Starting in June, the Liberals stopped applauding their own MPs in question period.

This seemed to have a positiveimpact on Regan's ability to single out heckling MPs. Over the first 64sitting days in the House, Regan's average rate of calling out hecklers was once every 3.6days.But after the Liberals began to hold their applause, Regancalled outa heckler once every 1.9 sitting days.

If question period remains a time when one side of the House sits on its hands and the other side heckles at its own peril, there is a chance that decorum will indeed improve over the longer term.

While that might sap some of the cut and thrust of politics out of the place, it would certainly be a relief to thosesweating tourists in the gallery, who choose to spendtheir few vacation days in the nation's capitalwatching grown men and women,with their six-figure salaries and tailored finery,yell incoherentlyat each other.

• The Pollcast: The theatre of question period