Jean-Pierre Kingsley still has concerns over electoral changes

Canada's former chief electoralofficerhas come out swinging against the amended version of the proposed fair elections act, known as Bill C-23,including the compromise on the controversial issue of vouching.

Some people will not go to the polls because they are confused, so it's a form of self-disenfranchisement.- Jean-PierreKingsley

"This (Bill C-23) will result in some people having more difficulty voting," Jean-PierreKingsleytold host Evan Solomon on CBC Radio's The House.

"Some people will not go to the polls because they are confused, so it's a form of self-disenfranchisement."

The government's 45 proposed amendments to the bill are a step in the right direction, but the changes don't go for enough, Kingsley said. The amendments includebacking down on the elimination of vouching, but Kingsley says the government missed the mark on thatissue entirely.

• Pierre Poilievre offers vouching alternative in elections bill
• Fair elections act: 7 things you may not know
• Why Canadians are shruggingoff fair elections act
• Debate gets ugly as Conservatives press forward with elections bill

"What I do not understand is why you require two pieces of IDif you're going to be vouched for by somebody else," Kingsley said.

Show me the fraudsters, says Kingsley

Earlier this week in the House of Commons, Prime Minister Stephen Harper suggested there may be voters who use vouching to cast ballots because they "have no intention" of proving their identity.

But Kingsley calledout the prime minister and said if Harper is aware of cases of voter fraud, he should bring that information forward immediately.

"Prime Minister, please tell us who they (fraudsters) are," Kingsley said.

After the next election, the bill should be reviewed by a parliamentary committee in detail, saysKingsley.

"Let us document exactly who is disadvantaged by the rules, who is advantaged ... and get a grip on this once and for and so we start making decisions as a country," Kingsley said.

Kingsley casts doubton robocalls report

Kingsley also weighed in on the so-called robocalls scandal, the allegations of misleading and nuisance phone calls made during the 2011 federal election that some said were an effort to confuse voters and dissuade them from casting their ballot.

Elections Canada's recent report, which said no charges would be laid in connection with the complaints didn't reveal the whole truth aboutthe robocalls scandal, saidKingsley.

• 3 roadblocks to the robocalls probe and their possible fixes
• Robocalls made across Canada in 2011 won't bring charges

"We may think we've gotten to the bottom of robocalls, I wish I could feel like that," Kingsley said.

It was impossible for Elections Canadato determine what really happened regarding the thousands of alleged cases of misleading or nuisance calls, because Elections Canada wasn't able to compel witnesses, Kingsley said.

Elections Canada officials asked repeatedly for the power to compel oral evidence from witnesses, but the federal government didn't grant the request.

"I would have been satisfied with the result (of the report) if people had been compelled and we still had found nothing." Kingsley said.