NAFTA talks: U.S. proposal for cross-border data storage at odds with B.C., N.S. law

One of the American targets inthe upcoming renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement appears on a collision course with privacy laws in British Columbia and Nova Scotia.

In negotiating objectives published last week, the Office of the United States Trade Representative said it wanted to "establish rules to ensure that NAFTA countries do not impose measures that restrict cross-border data flows and do not require the use or installation of local computing facilities."

But provincial legislation in two Canadian provinces does exactly that, with rulesrequiring personal information collected by governments, such as health records,to be stored on domestic serversto prevent it being accessed for reasons other than those for which it was collected.

• Trump administration reveals goals ahead of NAFTA talks

For example, underthe U.S. Patriot Act brought in to fight terrorism in the days after Sept. 11, if a Canadian government had contracted a U.S. facilityto storeelectronic records, Americansecurity or intelligence officers could access them.

"This is something that we have decided democratically that we want to do to protect our privacy rights," said Vincent Gogolek, the executive director of B.C.'s Freedom of Information and Privacy Association.

Following an outcry over the moveby aprevious Liberal government in B.C. to outsource the administration of government health-care information, "this is something that has acquired political consensus in B.C.," he said.

"We want the feds to protect our privacy rights."

'Swapping rights for tariffs'

Canadian restrictions on data storage have been a burr under the USTR'ssaddlefor years, even before the most recent push to modernize NAFTAfor e-commerce.

"The American position is that we would prefer to have our server farms in Arizona or California or wherever... and you send your data down here," Gogoleksaid. The U.S. viewpoint is: "this gets in the way of usmaking money, and we resent it, so we want you to change it."

"They haven't had any opportunity to go after it, and this is their opportunity," he said. But Canada "shouldn't be swapping rights off in exchange for lower tariffs on widgets. It should be pretty straightforward for the federal government to just stand up and say 'No, we're not doing it.'"

Previous negotiations among the three NAFTApartners, who were all part of the 12-country Trans-Pacific Partnership, proposedgrandfatheringexisting privacy legislation.Would that happen this time? It's unclear.

The federal government hasn't been afraid ofinvokingnational security to ensuregovernment email is stored in Canada, Gogolek said. Ifit's willing to do that,"why shouldn't we be protecting Canadians' information generally, that they have to provide to government?"

Both provinces adopted their laws over a decade ago, out of concern about foreign intelligence gathering without notice to individuals, which isn't consistent with Canadian privacy standards.

"It isn't so much about the security, because of course you could have better security on a foreign server. The problem is that if the server is in the United States, then American law applies to it," saidCatherineTully, the information and privacy commissioner for Nova Scotia.

She said she does occasionally hear from organizations unhappy about having to comply. But database services and cloud providers are increasingly available in Canada, she said.

"Public bodies get to access a lot of our personal information so they can provide us with services. In exchange we expect public bodies to protect that data," she said.

Protectionism or security?

The Information Technology Association of Canadawhich represents 330 technology companies, two-thirds of which are Canadian-owned small and medium-sized businesses said in its recent submission to Canada's NAFTAconsultation process that it wants to see more open contracting for all public institutions.

"Data residency rules don't make a whole lot of sense. It really creates a false sense of security," said David Messer, ITAC'svice-president of policy. "Most internet traffic, whether it's emails or data goes around the world," he said, including major exchange points in Seattle or New York.

"The way to address security in the cloud and over the internet isn't through data localization," he said, but other safeguardslike contractual obligations for service providers and encryption.

Vital national security data may need to staylocal, Messer said. But too much of this discussion is driven by paranoia aboutU.S. intelligence services, he said. "The focus needs to be on outcomes, not on arbitrary things like location."

Dolocal storage requirements createlocaljobs?

"You're not going to get thousands of jobs working at a server farm," he said. Meanwhile, prohibiting cloud computing could really drive up costs for taxpayers.

"If that's our approach to economic development, it's not a great one," he said.

'Standing up for our values'

John Horgansaid during B.C.'sprovincial election campaign that hesupports maintainingthe privacy legislation and would resist any move by the Trump administration to undermine these rights.

The premier met with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in Ottawa Tuesday.Trade was on their agenda, but they didn't address this particular issue in their public remarks.

Trudeau and other federal officials saythat in the lead-up to the start of NAFTA talks next month, they won't be negotiating in public: they'll keeptheir detailedstrategyclose to their chests.

PM and Horgan on NAFTA re negotiations

7 years ago

Duration 0:50

BC Premier John Horgan met with PM Justin Trudeau for the first time Tuesday

In response to a request forcomment,Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland's spokesperson Adam Austen emailed a general statement saying the government is committed to hearing from Canadians about their priorities.

"When negotiations begin, we will be ready to work with our partners to modernize NAFTA, while defending Canada's national interest and standing up for our values," he wrote.

Freeland agreedlast week toappear before the Commons trade committee Aug. 14 to discuss Canada'spriorities. That meetingistwo days before talks with American and Mexican negotiators officially begin on Aug. 16.

From Ottawa, Horgan is heading to Washington for more meetings Wednesday todefendB.C.'s trade interests.