Prostitution bill: Tories agree to narrow ban on 'public communication' - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 04:23 AM | Calgary | -12.0°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Politics

Prostitution bill: Tories agree to narrow ban on 'public communication'

In response to criticism that a blanket ban on all "public communication" where someone under the age of 18 could reasonably be present, the government has refined its proposed rewrite of Canada's prostitution laws to narrow those restrictions to areas near schools, playgrounds or daycare centres.

Change comes in response to widespread concern that bill would criminalize sex workers

MPs Boivin and Dechert on prostitution bill

10 years ago
Duration 1:27
NDP MP Francoise Boivin asks what bill C-36 is intended to do, Tory MP Bob Dechert says it is to tell purchasers of sex, "this is not right."

The federal government has refined its bill to change Canada's prostitution laws, though it may not be enough to silence most critics.

In response to widespread criticism of a provision that would impose a blanket ban on all "public communication" by sex workers, Conservative MPs have voted to narrow those restrictions to areas near schools, playgrounds or daycare centres.

"Every clarification makes it more supportable under the charter," Conservative MP Bob Dechert told reporters after the meeting.

"It will reduce the likelihood that it will be challenged, and it will make what the bill means much clearer."

Dechert also serves as parliamentary secretary to Justice Minister Peter MacKay.

The ban on public communication originally applied to all areas where those under the age of 18 could "reasonably" be present.

The government has also accepted an NDP proposal for a mandatory committee review of the legislation's impact after five years, although the NDP had pushed for a review after two years.

New Democrat MP and justice critic Francoise Boivin wondered why the government couldn't simply adopt the original amendment.

"Why can't you just say yes, completely, once?"

The changes were made during the committee's clause-by-clause review of Bill C-36, the second and final phase of its study on the government's bid to rewrite Canada's prostitution laws.

Over the course of four days last week, during back-to-back sessions, MPs heard from more than 70 witnesses, including current and former sex workers, families of women victimized by the sex trade, law enforcement, legal experts, academics, researchers, front-line outreach workers and human rights activists.

Nearly all of the witnesses including many of those who were, by and large, supportive of the bill had urged the government to strip the bill of any provisions that could result in criminal charges against sex workers, particularly the now amended section on public communication, which some witnesses said would pose a risk to the safety of sex workers.

The government's amendment didn't go as far as most witnesses had recommended and may not be sufficient to allay fears.

The NDP put forward 11 amendments, all but one of which were either defeated, or deemed inadmissible by the chair.

The committee also rejected several amendments proposed by Independent MP Maria Mourani, who wanted the preamble to the bill to declare prostitution itself "unlawful."

A list of all proposed amendments was released Tuesday morning.

No amendments from Liberals, Greens

A spokesman for Liberal MP Sean Casey said his party didn't propose any changes, as the Liberals voted against the bill at second reading. He did, however, support several amendments, including the change to the section on public communication.

Justice Minister Peter MacKay had suggested he was open to amendments, but his office had been tight-lipped over what, if any, proposed changes the government was prepared to support. (Chris Wattie/Reuters)

Green Party Leader Elizabeth May told CBC News the bill was "so bad" there was no way to amend it, although her party intends to put forward motions to delete provisions at report stage.

Ultimately, though, it was up to the government and, specifically, Justice Minister Peter MacKay to decide what changes should be made to the bill based on what the committee heard during last week's marathon session.

The bill will be back before the House for a final vote in the fall.

With files from The Canadian Press