Revenue Canada to tax employee discounts but Ottawa says it's not 'targeting' retail workers

Thenational revenue minister says she is not looking to target the country's retail workers, even after the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) issued guidelinesto business owners that could pave the way for new taxeson merchandise purchased with an employee discount.

The CRA saidina document posted on its websitethat discounts for merchandise should be treated as a taxable benefit. The tax collector said thatwhen an employee receives a discount on merchandise as a benefit of their employment the value of the discount should be included in the employee's income at tax time.

"However, no amount is included in the employee's income if the discount is also available to the general public or to specific public groups," CRA said in its "folio," a document written in plain language and disseminated to employers to help them interpret the tax code.

The onus would largely be on the employer to keep track of how much an employee saved with discounts in a given year,as they typically fileT4s (a statement of remuneration paid) with the CRAfor each of their workers.

This whole exercise is about "clarifying" the law, Liberal MP Marco Mendicino said Tuesday during an appearance on CBC'sPower & Politics."If you've got an employee discount that is not available to the public at any point in time, then it will be categorized as a taxable benefit," he said.

The Canada Revenue Agency issued a recent 'folio' that said employee discounts will now be considered taxable benefits

7 years ago

Duration 8:47

MPs - Marco Mendicino, Pierre Poilievre, and Pierre-Luc Dusseault discuss

Retailers hate the idea

That stipulation was cold comfort to the Retail Council of Canada, who said the proposed CRA changes will be a "potentially horrendous burden" for employers and employees alike who will have to maintain reams of paperwork.

Nor is it clear when a discount will be considered to be offered to the general public and therefore not taxable.

"I don't quite know what that means. If you give the same discount to everybody all year long then there's really no employee discount?I don't know how long would be long enough, and to whom? Red-headed veterans? It does strike me as a bit of an artifice," Karl Littler, the vice-president of public affairs at the council, said in an interview with CBC News.

• 'We did it the way we intended to': Morneau weathers tax storm of his own making

In the past, merchandise discounts were only considered taxable if the price paid by the employee was below the actualcost of the good to the employer.

According to the agency'swebsite, the change is effective as of the 2017 tax year, along withanother major change to the tax code the elimination of thepublic transit tax credit.

2 million retail workers

Many of Canada's twomillion retail workers receive comparatively generous discounts at their place of work,with somecompanies offering as much as 50 per cent off regular prices.Such discounts are widely seen as a perk to working in sectors thattypically offer less pay, irregular work hoursandfew other benefits.

The difference between the "fair market value" of the merchandise purchasedand what the employee paidis what will have to be claimed on a tax return. For example, if an employeebuys an$80 sweater for $40, then the employee would have to claim the $40 difference as income.

"It strikes me as odd that you would want to impose this on what are primarily modest income earners," Littler said. "I thought it actually might be a typo."

During an appearance before the House of Commons finance committee late last month, Littler raised issues with the folio's new wording. He saidLiberal MP Kamal Khera, the parliamentary secretary to the national revenue minister, and others on the committee, weren't even aware such a major change was coming,even though CRA announced the change last fall.

• Liberal MP told he could face 'consequences' for breaking party ranks over small business tax changes

"That frankly reaffirms my view that this was done without political oversight, without necessary full supervision, even up to the upper levels of CRA ...it would be cheeky to sayit lacksadult supervision but that's sort of the impression we get," he said.

CRA's interpretation has changed

National Revenue MinisterDiane Lebouthillier said Tuesday there have been no changes to the laws governing taxable benefits to retail employees.

"The agency issued a guidance document to mainly provide assistance for employers and is committed to further clarifying the wording of the guidance to reflect this," she said in an emailed statement. "We are not targeting individuals working in retail."

While it is true no legislation has beenchanged, the agency's new interpretation of the income tax law could still be costly formany low-income wage earners.

"Just because the law hasn't changed doesn't mean anything if the interpretation has," Littler said, "And it has."

Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative finance critic, said it's "insanity" that workers will have to document all the discounts they receive on merchandise each yearunder the new interpretation.

He said if all discounts are not documented, it could turn regular law-abiding Canadians into tax cheats.

"Hardworking, low-income, wage-earning retail workers should not have to pay tax on the small employee discounts they receive, this tax will actually cost more to administer and enforce than it will raise in revenue but it's perfectly consistent with Justin Trudeau's uncontrollable addiction to spending.

"He's running out of other people's money and now he's asking CRA to find him more," he said.

• Morneau admits 'changes are going to be required' on tax proposals