Canadian firm shipped armoured cars to lawless Libya despite UN warning

A Canadian-owned company continued to ship dozens of armoured personnel carriers into the bloody, factional chaos of Libya, despite being confronted in 2014 by United Nations investigators who say the sales violated the arms embargo against the war-torn country.

• Canadian armoured car sale to South Sudan should be investigated, rights groups say
• ANALYSIS|On Saudi arms deal, the new boss in Ottawa is just like the old boss

Earlier this year, a UN report criticized theStreitGroup, which has a plant inInnisfil, Ont., north of Toronto, for the "illicit transfer" of 131 armoured vehicles in 2012, some of which may have been manufactured in Canada.

The company met with international investigators during the writing of the UN evaluation in 2014 and insisted it had done nothing wrong.

In the course of their interviews, the UN investigators privately raised concern Streit's activities in Libya constituted a violation of sanctions.

But leaked shipping records and sales delivery schedulesobtained by CBC Newsshow the company didn't heed the advice to stop its armoured car shipments to the troubled North African nation.

At least 79 Typhoon and Spartan patrol vehicles were delivered to the effectively lawless nation in 2014, according to records obtained from highly placed sources.

Human rights groups say the documents raise further concerns about whether the company's sales and practices have inflamed civil wars in not only Libya, but other African nations such as South Sudan and theDarfurregion of Sudan.

"When we're talking about arms deals with countries like South Sudan and Libya, that raises very serious red flags," said AlexNeve, secretary general of Amnesty International Canada.

"There is absolutely no question that a decision to sell arms, in the context of those two countries, contributed either directly or indirectly to the worsening human rights situation in both of those countriesand simply should not have been something the company considered to do at all."

Vehicles 'donated' through 4 companies

Leaked shipping records also showStreit'ssales were brokered through middlemen.

At least four separate companies, one American and three from the United Arab Emirates, purchased the vehicles.

Almost all of the vehicles the UAE companies bought, which were unarmed when shipped, were "donated" to either local militias such as theSawaqBrigade or the Libyan Interior Ministry at a time when there was no cohesive government.

The UAE, which has supported rebel factions in the North African country since 2011, admitted to UN investigators that it often had trouble confirming whoreceivedthe vehiclesbecause of the chaos in Libya.

The paper trail and published reports in the region show further deliveries took place last year.

In fact, one shipment was seized by Greek patrol ships in July 2015 on the suspicion it violated the arms embargo and wasn't released by UN officials until last December when the newly recognized government laid claim to it.

The cargo ship had been bound forMisrata, which has been the scene ofa number ofISIS attacks.

UN panel says sanctions breached

A UN panel that monitors the arms embargo, imposed as Libyan dictatorMoammarGadhafi'sregimeunravelledin 2011, concluded that the UAE "donation" ofStreitvehicles in 2012 and other weapons transfers breached the sanctions.

The Streit Group, which is owned by Canadian businessman Guerman Goutorov, was repeatedly asked for comment by CBC, but did not respond.

It did answer questions from UN investigators looking into the Libya case.

Company officials handed over a variety of records showing the transfer of Cougar, Spartan and Cobra-type vehicles in 2012, as well as customs declarations.Streitinsisted it had done nothing wrong.

"In its response, the company 'strenuously reject any suggestion thatStreitGroup could knowingly or otherwise break national or international law,'" the panel's report says.

Human rights lawyer Paul Champ says the UN report provides the Canadian government with ample evidence to investigate and possibly prosecuteStreitfor allegedly violating the Special Economic Measures Act. He says the Liberal government should have acted last spring when the panel issued its report.

• ANALYSIS|Commando-style diplomacy finds an unexpected foothold in war-torn Libya
• ISIS gaining strength in Libya

Global Affairs Canada has argued that because the company's dealings were conducted in the UAE and brokered through that country, there's nothing Canada can do under its existing arms export regime.

Officials say they take the issue seriously and the Liberal government is committed to strengthening Canada's trade export rules through transparency and by acceding to the Arms Trade Treaty.

Nevedoesn't buy the explanation and says there should be an investigation.

"It is stunning and deeply disappointing to see that a Canadian company whatever the nature of their offshore operations were was selling military equipment to South Sudan, in the middle of that country's brutal civil war, and also to Libya in the midst of the chaos and lawlessness that has prevailed there over the last five years," he said.

UN, Canada at odds

In a further twist, it looks as though the Canadian government may have approved the 2012 shipment of some of theStreitvehicles that the UN was originally upset about.

According to reports tabled in June in Parliament, Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird signed off on $2.68 million in armoured vehicle export sales to Libya during 2012-13, the same time frame the UN was investigating.

Officials in the now-renamed department Global Affairs Canada wouldn't say which company's export approval was involved, only that the sales were "not prohibited by existing United Nations sanctions on Libya."

But UN investigatorsclearly disagree.

A 2013 resolution somewhat relaxed the conditions on Libya by allowing for the transfer of non-lethal equipment, which could include unarmed military armoured personnel carriers, orAPCs.

The panel, which advises the UN secretary general, says easing those conditions was a mistake that should be rectified.

"The panel believes that all transfers ofAPCsshould be under embargo as they significantly increase the military capability of armed groups," the panel's report says. "In addition, most types ofAPCsidentified by the panel can easily be mounted with weapons after delivery. The panel is also concerned about diversions of this... [material] to militias."

Streit'sSouth Sudan controversy

It'sthe second time the UN has linked theStreitGroup to the practice of diversion.

A separate report and a series of leaked documents obtained this week by CBC News show 173 armoured vehicles destined for the police in South Sudan in 2014 were diverted for army use in the brutal ongoing civil war.

• Canadian armoured car sale to South Sudan should be investigated, rights groups say
• ANALYSIS|On Saudi arms deal, the new boss in Ottawa is just like the old boss

Champ says Streit's dealings in Libya and South Sudan exploit a loophole in arms export rules and rewriting those regulations, including the ones that permitted the federal government's$15-billion arms deal with Saudi Arabia, is long overdue.

"Right now, Canada's export control regime in respect to goods and weapons and armaments, I think, are the weakest among all the NATO countries," he said. "If you look at the Export Permits Act and the export control list, it's very, very vaguely worded and I think would be impossible to enforce."