Convoy protests showed Supreme Court security should be 'a priority': chief justice

Canada's chief justice says the safety of theSupreme Court of Canada building needs to be taken more seriously following this winter's convoy protest in downtown Ottawa.

Earlier this year, protesters rallying againstCOVID-19 restrictions parked trucks along Wellington Street the location ofboth Parliament Hill andCanada's top court for more than three weeks.

"Most recent events have shown that the priority was put on the Parliament buildings and not so much onthe Supreme Court building," Chief Justice Richard Wagner told reporters during his annual news conference.

"And so I would hope that the Supreme Court building will be considered as a priority in terms of safety and security."

The Supreme Court falls outside of the parliamentary precinct and therefore outside the jurisdiction of the Parliamentary Protective Service police force.

Multiple parliamentary committees are examining how police, security officials and the government responded to the winter protests. One of those committees is studying the boundaries of the parliamentary precinct.

That committee has heard witnesses say that jurisdictional lines between the Ottawa Police Service, the RCMP and the Parliamentary Protective Service made policing the protesters who sometimes cartedcans of fuel and fireworks into the protest zonemore difficult. Committee membersalso have heard calls to keep the street closed to vehicles.

Wagner's comments about security came just days after theU.S. House passed a bill extending security protectionto Supreme Court justices' immediate family members.

The U.S. Supreme Court has been the subject of protests in reaction to an anticipated ruling curtailing abortion rights. A California man arrested last weeknear Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's homehas been indicted on a charge of attemptingto assassinate Kavanaugh.

Wagner said that while he believes Canada enjoys aless polarized top court, he still urged caution.

"We should not ignore some events that could create some problems for us as well. We should not undermine the efforts to increase the security," he said.

"The events in Ottawa last January have shown that it could be a problem. Let's hope that it will be referred to as an anecdote in our history, but maybe it won't. We never know. So I think that we should take this question very seriously."

During Thursday's news conference, Wagner also spoke ofthe importanceof defending the court's judicial independence.

"We should continue our best efforts to support our democracy, to support judicial independence, to support the rule of law. Because that's the root of the confidence and the trust of the people," he said.

"When they lose faith in their institutions, trouble occurs. That's my fear."

Wagner says a draft decision leak unlikely in Canada

The protests in the U.S. follow the explosive leak of a draft majority opinion last month that would strike down Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion in the United States.

Wagner said he's confident such a leak wouldn't happen here, citing what he calledthe professionalism of the court's staff and clerks.

"Does that mean it could never happen in the future? Nobody can say that but I would be very much surprised," he said.

"We don't have this polarization here in Canada on issues. Even on very sensitive issues, like in the Criminal Code for instance, medical aid to suicide for example, gay marriage name it, we've had to deal with those very sensitive issues throughout the years. We never experienced that polarization and that's the main difference with what's happening in the U.S."

Wagner took a wide array of questions from reporters. He was askedhow courts should hear cases now that most COVID-19 restrictions have been lifted.

The top justice said the legal system shouldn't return to pre-pandemic waysof doing things and promoted remote hearings.

"The technology levels the playing field for all. This improves access to justice," he said.

"Truly, it does not matter if counsel is standing before them or appearing on screen. Strong, well-reasoned and persuasive arguments can be made from anywhere."