Wednesdays with @Kady replay: Who's more transparent now?

The revelations just keep coming in the ongoing expenses controversy.

And so does the political gamesmanship as all partiestry to downplay past blemishes and gain the upper hand in the race to be seen as the champion of transparency in the eyes of the voting public.

Who's willing to disclose all? Who's got something to hide? Who's trying to have it both ways?

As the one-upmanship unfolds, CBC Politics blogger Kady O'Malley hosts her weekly people's caucus to take your comments and questions about the ongoing expenses controversies in both the Commons and the Senate.

• Will tomorrow'sSenate board of internal economy committee meetingwith the audit team from Deloitte become public? How confident are you thatAuditor General Michael Ferguson's involvementwill help sort out thefundamental issues on Senate expenses?
• If MPs have nothing to hide,why did the Commons not unanimously adopt Trudeau's motionsabout disclosing House expenses and making its board of internal economy proceedings more transparent?
• What do you make of recent Elections Canada expense file revelations: not only the case againsttwo Manitoba MPswhosome feel should be suspended, but also this week's disclosure ofparliamentary secretary Eve Adams' tastes?

Plus: What do you make of Harper'stransparency announcement for the resource sectortoday in London? Has Canada been transparent enough aboutwhat's happening at the table with its EU trade talks?What else do you think this European trip will accomplish can he continue tobrush off demands to disclose that $90 K chequeor explainhow hischief of staff's secret fundis used?

Replay our live chat: