Prehistoric massacre in Kenya may be oldest evidence of warfare - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 07:38 PM | Calgary | -11.6°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Science

Prehistoric massacre in Kenya may be oldest evidence of warfare

Scientists think they've found the oldest evidence of human warfare, fossils of a band of men, women and children massacred by a troop of attackers with clubs and stone blades on the shores of a lagoon in Kenya about 10,000 years ago.

Stone Age victims at Nataruk site include pregnant woman, 6 children

The remains of 27 Stone Age people slaughtered 10,000 years ago include this man, found lying prone in the lagoons sediments. The skull has multiple lesions on the front and on the left side, consistent with wounds from a blunt implement, such as a club. (Image by Marta Mirazon Lahr, enhanced by Fabio Lahr)

Man's inhumanity to man, as18th century Scottish poet Robert Burns put it, is no recentdevelopment.

Scientists said on Wednesday they had found the oldestevidence of human warfare, fossils of a band of people massacredby a troop of attackers with weapons including arrows, clubs andstone blades on the shores of a lagoon in Kenya about 10,000years ago.

The remains of 27 people from a Stone Age hunter-gathererculture were unearthed at a site called Nataruk roughly 20 miles(30 km) west of Lake Turkana in northern Kenya.

One man's skeleton was found with a sharp blade made of avolcanic glass called obsidian still embedded in his skull.Another man had wounds from two blows to the head apparentlywith a club, crushing his skull. A woman in the last stages ofpregnancy appeared to have been bound by her hands and feet.

Marta Mirazon Lahr and Justus Edung excavated the skeleton was of a woman, found reclining on her left elbow, with fractures on the knees and possibly the left foot. The position of the hands suggests her wrists may have been bound. She was found surrounded by fish. (Robert Foley)

Victims also had projectile wounds to the neck and brokenskulls, hands, knees and ribs.

University of Cambridge paleoanthropologist Marta Mirazon Lahrsaid evidence indicates these people, who hunted animals,caught fish and gathered edible plants, were slain in apremeditated attack by raiders, perhaps from another region.

'Brutal, physical, lethal'

"It is a brutal, physical, lethal attack with the intentionto kill those individuals who could put up a defence or mount acounter-attack, or who perhaps were of no use to them, whetherit was a man or a very pregnant woman, too young or too old," saidMirazon Lahr.

Our species arose 200,000 years ago in Africa. Many scholarshad thought warfare first emerged long after the time of theNataruk people when humans formed settled communities instead ofa nomadic, hunter-gatherer existence.

The Nataruk fossils "raise the question of whether warfarehas been part of the human experience for much longer thanpreviously thought," Mirazon Lahradded.

A planned attack would suggest that resources the Natarukpeople possessed, perhaps water, dried meat or fish, nuts oreven women and children, were considered valuable, she said.

There were remains of 21 adults and six children, most underage 6. There were no older teenagers. "Whether they managed toescape, or were taken, we will never know," she said.

"At the end, all massacres are savage," Mirazon Lahrsaid.

"How many examples do we have from our very recent, and current,history? But finding the remains of a massacre among theskeletons of hunter-gatherers of this period was totallysurprising."

The research appeared in the journal Nature.