American-made lethal weapons heading to Ukraine, U.S. officials say - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 08:45 PM | Calgary | -7.7°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
World

American-made lethal weapons heading to Ukraine, U.S. officials say

Ukraine will soon have more lethal American-made weapons to help it fight Russian-backed separatists.

Move deepens Washington's involvement in conflict and could further strain relations with Russia

Members of the separatist self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic army collect parts of a destroyed Ukrainian army tank in the town of Vuhlehirsk on Feb.16, 2015. (Reuters)

Ukraine will soon have more lethal American-made weapons to help it fight Russian-backed separatists.

U.S. officials said Friday that the Trump administration approved a plan to provide lethal weapons to Ukraine,a long-awaited move that deepens America's involvement in the military conflict and may further strain relations with Russia.

The new arms include American-made Javelin anti-tank missiles that Ukraine has long sought to boost its defences against Russian-backed separatists in the country's east. The fighting has killed more than 10,000 since 2014. Previously, the U.S. has provided Ukraine with support equipment and training, and has let private companies sell some small arms like rifles.

The officials describing the plan weren't authorized to discuss it publicly and demanded anonymity.

The move is likely to become another sore point between Washington and Moscow, as U.S. President Donald Trump contends with ongoing questions about whether he's too hesitant to confront the Kremlin. Ukraine accuses Russia of sending the tanks, and the U.S. says Moscow is arming, training and fighting alongside the separatists.

Trump had been considering the plan for some time after the State Department and the Pentagon signed off earlier this year. President Barack Obama also considered sending lethal weapons to Ukraine, but left office without doing so.

The State Department, responsible for overseeing foreign military sales, would not confirm that anti-tank missiles or other lethal weapons would be sent. But in a statement late Friday, State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert said the U.S. had decided to provide "enhanced defensive capabilities" to help Ukraine build its military long-term, defend its sovereignty and "deter further aggression."

"U.S. assistance is entirely defensive in nature, and as we have always said, Ukraine is a sovereign country and has a right to defend itself," Nauert said.

'Defensive' weapons

The White House's National Security Council declined to comment. Russia's embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment late Friday.

Although the portable Javelin anti-tank missiles can kill, proponents for granting them to Ukraine have long argued they are considered "defensive" because the Ukrainians would use them to protect their territory and deter the Russians, not to attack a foreign country or seize new territory.

Russian military officers serving at the Joint Centre for Control and Coordination march in the town of Soledar, Ukraine, on Dec. 17. (Oleksandr Klymenko/Reuters)

Under law, the State Department must tell Congress of planned foreign military sales, triggering a review period in which lawmakers can act to stop them. It was unclear whether the administration had formally notified Congress, but lawmakers are unlikely to try to block it given that Democrats and Republicans alike have long called on the government to take the step.

The move comes as the United States and European nations struggle to break a long logjam in the Ukraine-Russia conflict that erupted three years ago when fighting broke out between Russian-backed separatists and government troops in the east. France, Russia and Germany brokered a peace arrangement in 2015 that has lowered violence but not stopped it, and a political settlement outlined in the deal hadn't been fully implemented.

Russian officials and lawmakers warned Saturday that the U.S. decision will only fuel hostilities and raise casualties from the conflict.Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said that the U.S. administration's move has "crossed a line," adding that the U.S. can no longer claim a mediatory role.

"It's an accomplice in fuelling a war," he said in a statement.

Without mentioning the U.S. decision, France and Germany on Saturday urged combatants to fully implement a much-violated ceasefire agreement.

People cross a checkpoint guarded by separatist rebels between Ukrainian government-controlled and rebel-controlled areas in the village of Luhanska, on March 7. (Alexander Ermochenko/Associated Press)

German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron issued a joint statement urging combatants to observe the 2015 Minsk agreements aimed at de-escalating the conflict. Those provisions include the withdrawal of heavy weapons such as tanks and rocket launchers from the frontline area and an exchange of prisoners.

The two leaders also called for the return of Russian military officers to a joint coordination centre that plays a role in monitoring the ceasefire.

Merkel and Macron said in their statement that "there is no alternative to an exclusively peaceful solution to the conflict."

Rise in violence

In recent days, U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has warned that violence is up about 60 per cent this year. In Europe earlier this month, Tillerson called Russia's involvement the biggest tension point between the former Cold War rivals.

"It stands as the single most difficult obstacle to us renormalizing the relationship with Russia, which we badly would like to do," Tillerson said.

The intensified support for Ukraine's military also comes amid early discussions about sending UNpeacekeepers to eastern Ukraine, to improve security conditions not only for Ukrainians but for special monitors from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe who are on the ground in Ukraine.

Anatoliy and Elena Karabaz, two residents of Avdiivka in eastern Ukraine, stand in their destroyed home. (Anton Skyba)

The U.S. and other nations were cautiously optimistic when Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed to send in peacekeepers. But there are major disagreements about how and where the peacekeepers would operate, especially about whether they'd be deployed only on the "line of conflict" between separatists and the government.

Both the Obama administration and the Trump administration had expressed concerns in the past that injecting more weapons into the conflict was unlikely to resolve it, especially considering that Russia is well-equipped to respond to any Ukrainian escalation with an even stronger escalation of its own. Sending lethal weapons to Ukraine also creates the troubling possibility that American arms could kill Russian soldiers, a situation that could thrust the two nuclear-armed nations closer to direct confrontation.

The United States, under Obama, also imposed sanctions on Russia for its invasion and annexation of Crimea. The Trump administration has insisted those sanctions will stay in place until Moscow gives up the Crimean Peninsula.