Brexit may have to be delayed, British foreign secretary says - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 05:41 AM | Calgary | -11.9°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
World

Brexit may have to be delayed, British foreign secretary says

As the March 29 deadline looms, fears are growing that trade deals between the U.K. and the European Union won't be in place in time.

There are fears of economic chaos if trade deals are not in place between U.K., European Union

British Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt acknowledged in an interview with the BBC that Parliament may need extra days to pass 'critical legislation' if a Brexit deal is approved too close to the March 29 deadline. (Alastair Grant/Associated Press)

A key member of Prime Minister Theresa May's government acknowledged Thursday that Britain's exit from the European Union may have to be delayed if negotiations on a divorce deal drag on.

Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt told the BBC that while it is difficult to know whether negotiations will stretch to the final hours, a delay may be necessary to pass legislation to implement Brexit. His comments gained attention because of fears the country is simply not ready to leave even though May's Downing Street office insisted nothing had changed.

"I think it is true that if we ended up approving a deal in the days before 29 March then we might need some extra time to pass critical legislation, but if we are able to make progress sooner, then that might not be necessary," Hunt said.

The comments come as the influential think-tankthe Institute for Governmentwarned the government was not ready should a no-deal Brexit come to pass. The think-tank predicted that in a majority of broad policy areas, including health and borders, the government would be unable to avoid "major negative impacts."

"It is not just the government that needs to be ready business and citizens need to know how the changes will affect them and what they need to do," it said in a report.

A taxi drives past anti-Brexit signs on a street in London on Wednesday. A think-tank called the Institute for Government has warned that the U.K. would be unable to avoid "major negative impacts" if it doesn't negotiate a deal around its exit from the European Union. (Toby Melville/Reuters)

Britain's carmakers issued a stark assessment Thursday about Brexit's impact on the industry, warningtwo-thirds of the country's global trade is at risk if the U.K. leaves the European Unionwithout an agreement on the future.

Investment in the industry fell 46 per cent last year and new car production dropped 9.1 per cent to 1.52 million vehicles in 2018, in part because of concerns over Brexit, the Society of Motor Manufacturing said. Chief executive Mike Hawes has described the threat of no deal as "catastrophic."

"With fewer than 60 days before we leave the EU and the risk of crashing out without a deal looking increasingly real, UK Automotive is on red alert," Hawes said. "Brexit uncertainty has already done enormous damage to output, investment and jobs."

'Clear and present danger'

Hawes said the figures showing a drop in investment, stark though they are, pale in comparison to what is ahead should the U.K. leave the EU on March 29 without a deal, severing frictionless trade links overnight with the EU and other global markets. Parliament has refused to rule out a no-deal Brexit, voting this week instead to give May more time to try to iron out a compromise with the EU.

"Brexit is the clear and present danger and, with thousands of jobs on the line, we urge all parties to do whatever it takes to save us from 'no deal'," Hawes said.

If no deal is in place, existing trade agreements with the EU wouldevaporate overnight. Without such agreements, economic chaos is likely to follow, with fears about trade in food, medicine and other essential supplies.

In another sign of the ticking clock, House of Commons LeaderAndrea Leadsom said a scheduled February recess for lawmakers may be scrapped.

May must report back to the House of Commons by Feb. 13, either with a reworked version of the deal or a statement on what she plans to do next. She intends to return to Brussels in hopes of reopening negotiations on the most controversial aspect of the withdrawal deal, which covers the border between the U.K.'s Northern Ireland and EU member Ireland.

This section of the deal, known as the "backstop,"would keep the U.K. in a customs union with the EU in order to remove the need for checks along the border. Supporters of a sharp exit with the EU fear it wouldtrap Britain in regulatory lockstep with the trading bloc, and want the backstop replaced with unspecified "alternative arrangements."

EU leaders have been unwilling to reconsider the withdrawal agreement.

In a telephone call on Wednesday evening, Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar told May that it was necessary to have a backstop that was "legally robust and workable in practice."

The border is crucial to the divorce deal because it wouldbe the only land frontier between the U.K. and the EU after Brexit. Border checkpoints have disappeared since Ireland and Britain both became members of the EU single market in the 1990s, and since the 1998 Good Friday peace accord, which largely ended decades of violence in Northern Ireland.

European Council President Donald Tusk also spoke with May and later tweeted: "The EU position is clear and consistent. The Withdrawal Agreement is not open for renegotiation."